 | Sandford Nevile, Sir William Montagu Manning - 1834 - 1022 стор.
...case, grounded upon any simple contract, no acknowledgment or promise, by words only, shall be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the recited enactments, or either of them, or to deprive any party of the benefit thereof,... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, George Shall Yerger - 1836 - 668 стор.
...great, that in 1323, the Parliament interfered, and enacted that no acknowledgment or promise should be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take any case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, unless said acknowledgment or promise... | |
 | William Burge - 1838 - 1114 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, Frederick Watts, Henry Jonathan Sergeant - 1842 - 614 стор.
...case grounded upon any simple contract, no acknowledgment or promise, by words only, shall be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the said enactments (meaning 21 Jac. I. c. 16, and the Irish Act of 10 Car. I. Sess. 2.... | |
 | Law society - 1843 - 92 стор.
...statute.— (Sec. 7.) By statute 9 Geo. 4, c. 14, it is enacted, no acknowledgments should be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the statute, unless such acknowledgment be in writing1, to be made by some party chargeable... | |
 | Matthew Bacon, Sir Henry Gwilliam, Charles Edward Dodd - 1846 - 708 стор.
...the case grounded on any simple contract, no acknowledgment or promise by words only shall be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the said enactments, (the Statute of Limitations, 21 Jac. 1 c. 16,) or to deprive any... | |
 | William Francis Finlason - 1847 - 304 стор.
...the statute 9 Geo. IV. which enacts that " no acknowledgment or promise by words only shall be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the statute of limitations," &c. Now if such " acknowledgment or promise " were an account... | |
 | William Burge - 1847 - 626 стор.
...to interpose. By the 9 Geo. 4, c. 14, it is enacted, that no acknowledgment or promise by words only shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take any case out of the operation of the Statute of Limitations, or to deprive any party of the benefit... | |
| |
No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section... 
