Tyranny in Shakespeare
Lexington Books, 2002 - 180 стор.
Even the most explicitly political contemporary approaches to Shakespeare have been uninterested by his tyrants as such. But for Shakespeare, rather than a historical curiosity or psychological aberration, tyranny is a perpetual political and human problem. Mary Ann McGrail's recovery of the playwright's perspective challenges the grounds of this modern critical silence. She locates Shakespeare's expansive definition of tyranny between the definitions accepted by classical and modern political philosophy. Is tyranny always the worst of all possible political regimes, as Aristotle argues in his Politics? Or is disguised tyranny, as Machiavelli proposes, potentially the best regime possible? These competing conceptions were practiced and debated in Renaissance thought, given expression by such political actors and thinkers as Elizabeth I, James I, Henrie Bullinger, Bodin, and others. McGrail focuses on Shakespeare's exploration of the conflicting and contradictory passions that make up the tyrant and finds that Shakespeare's dramas of tyranny rest somewhere between Aristotle's reticence and Machiavelli's forthrightness. Literature and politics intersect in Tyranny in Shakespeare, which will fascinate students and scholars of both.
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Інші видання - Показати все
according action affection Antonio appears argues Ariel asks attempt attention audience begins believes Books Caliban cause chapter character claim common complete concern connection conscience criticism describes desire divine Duncan edition Elizabethan evil faith fear Ferdinand final force gives gods guilt Henry Hermione Holinshed honor human important interest interpretation justice kind king knowledge Lady language Leontes Leontes's look Macbeth Macduff Machiavelli Malcolm master means Miranda moral murder nature never notes offers opening Oracle passion Paulina play political present Prince problem Prospero question reason reference reflection relation requires response Richard rule ruler says scene seems sense sexual Shakespeare shows simply soliloquy soul speaks speech subjects succession suggests superior Tale Tempest things thou thought throne tion tragedy true truth tyranny tyrant understanding University Press usurpation Winter's wishes York