usurpations, and those abuses of immoderate power amongst the clergy which disgraced our annals in the tenth and eleventh centuries, and which have formed so copious a theme of decla mations against Popery, were the effect not of any thing natu rally inherent in the faith of the Catholic, or necessarily belonging to the discipline of his church; they universally originated in the weakness and wickedness of our rulers; they were privileges and immunities bartered by the crown for political equi valents, either without any reference to the general will and feelings of the people, or in direct opposition to them. But there is this consolation attending them, that they never can recur till our light shall have again become darkness, and the fabric of our civil and religious polity have crumbled into ruins. William the Norman began the odious traffic of enlisting religion on the side of civil tyranny, and paying the price of its service by grants, burdensome to the people, unfavourable to the interests of genuine piety, and at length oppressive and inconvenient even to the throne itself. In this system he was eagerly followed by the whole race of Norman kings. But had the advice of Lanfranc been regarded, such measures would never have been adopted. He was then at the head of the Catholic church of England, and he was never wanting to the cause of civil or even of religious liberty. He not only warned his master of the evil tendency of the course he was pursuing but exerted every faculty in resisting the consequences which that course drew after it. It was by William's own direction that the cognizance of ecclesiastical causes was withdrawn from the secular tribunals, and he insisted on the celibacy of the clergy with as much earnestness as Gregory himself. Henry the First bartered away the right of investiture, as the means and instrument of forwarding his views on Normandy; but both his nobility and his clergy warned him of the importance of the right he was thús abandoning, and even after it had been formally renounced, urged him, by the resolutions of an ecclesiastical synod held at Westminster, to resume it. To the same weakness and folly, and notwithstanding the very same remon strances, was owed the first introduction of Papal legates into England. The archbishop of Canterbury even went in person to Rome, to remonstrate against such an encroachment upon the liberties of the English church, but he was unsupported by the monarch on the throne. When the crown tottered on the head of Stephen, and the affections of his subjects were divided, he bargained for the political aid of the Roman pontiff, by rendering the monasteries independent both of the crown and their bishops, and attaching them solely to the jurisdiction of the papal see. The ecclesiastical authorities of England in vain objected to this measure likewise. The invasion of Ireland was planned as a matter of joint conspiracy between Henry the second and the pope. The church of Ireland had acknowledged the spiritual supremacy of the bishop of Rome, but with an authority both limited in extent and very precarious in its means of exercise. The plenitude of papal dominion was to be established through the medium of Henry's conquest, and Henry was to receive in return that semblance of right which a papal sanction was supposed to be able to confer. Neither the clergy, the nobility, or the people of either country, were parties to the plot, though they were made the instruments on one hand, and the victims on the other, of its unprincipled execution. The appointment of Becket to the see of Canterbury, which was afterwards the source of events so extraordinary, was strenuously opposed by the whole body of the clergy, who understood his character and appreciated his views." (To be continued.) Poetry. WINTER. A Song adapted to a German Tune, and the first of an intended Series, to be written for Music. The days are gone of joy and pleasure; The swain hath stored his welcome treasure, And yet 'mid storms and cloudiness, "Tis sweet when mists awhile subsiding, To gild the hoary mountains high: Now rests the swain, his labour ceasing, When round the angry tempest rages, The piercing wind and driving snow, And all its honoured form lies low; The leafless trees awhile may sorrow, February 14, 1823. F. C. H. Monsieur Gresset's Adieu to the Jesuits on quitting their Order. TO ABBE MARQUET. 'Tis now fulfill'd; what once of old But 'tis decreed, and reason's weight And tho' their household flames no more Thou know'st them not: their morals trace, How bless'd that I from interest free, In them untainted minds I've found, To those, by whom the're most revil'd; MONTHLY INTELLIGENCE. ENGLAND. ON Tuesday the 4th instant, both houses of parliament assembled for the dispatch of public business. Owing to the indisposition of his Majesty, the ceremony of opening the par liament was performed by commission. The principal topics in the speech regarded the affairs of Spain and Ireland, His Majesty laments the difference subsisting between France and Spain, and promises his best endeavours to avert the calamity of war, Respecting Ireland his Majesty recommends to the consideration of the two houses, such measures of internal regulation as may be calcu lated to promote and secure the tranquillity of that country, and to improve the habits and condition of the people." Mr. Wynn gave notice, in the name of Mr. Plunkett, of a motion on the Catholic question for the 20th of February. On the 14th Mr C. Hutchinson inquired if Mr. Plunkett persevered in bringing on his motion on the 20th, and was answered by Mr. Wynn the affirmative. Notwithstanding this assurance, however, on the 18th, Sir John Newport, in a very weak state of health appeared in the house, and after a few remarks on the iritated and unsettled state of Ireland, begged of Mr. Plunkett to postpone his motion, Mr. Secretary Canning coincided in the request of Sir John, and Mr, Plunkett was in consequence induced to put off his motion till the 17th of April. On the 19th, Mr. Brownlow presented three petitions to the House of Commons from some Orangemen in the county of Armagh, complaining of the bigotry and darkness of the people, and stating that the greatest obstacles to the mental improvement of the people were to be found in the machinations of the Jesuits, some of whom were established in the south of Ireland, Sir H. Parnell and Mr. C. Hutchinson denied that any such society exexisted in any part of the country; the latter wished the petitions to be rejected. Sir J. Newport deprecated rejecting at the present monient any petition from Ireland. Mr. Brougham knew of no other constitutional grounds for rejecting any petition but the impropriety of its language. While the petitioners, however, complained of mental igno rance and bigotry, they did not seem to be over well informed themselves, The Jesuits might be accused of bigotry, of perverting knowledge, of usurp ing power over the minds of men ; but this he believed was the first time they were eyer accused of promoting ignorance. With all their faults, this society, which was the patron of edu cation, could not be said to keep the people in mental darkness. It might have been of advantage to the petitioners had they imbibed some of the tone of the Jesuits. They had not been to school to them, and were so little redundant in knowledge, that they were ignorant of the first rudiments of the science of spelling. In tolerance was spelt with three e's instead of two and an a, and they cut off the final e of pervade to add it to the other word. They had evidently not lived near the establishment of which they complained. Petitions from such quarters were not often seen, and he was for letting it lie on the table. Mr. Brownlow said there was nothing more distressing than the divisions which existed among the people, He felt them from his heart. The great evil, and the cause of all the other evils of Ireland, was, that one part of the people was always op posed to the other. The petitions were ordered to lie on the table. IRELAND. Dublin Evening Post, Feb. 1, 1823.By the following letter of Bishop Coppinger, it will be seen that Dr. Collins is likely to owe his elevation to the see of Cashel, to the recommendation of the prelates of Munster, and not to the interferences of the civil power. In the present crisis of Catholic affairs, we do not deem it expedient to re-open the question involved in this letter, nor to investigate too closely |