Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Том 34
Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, James Buckley Black, Michael Crawford Kerr, John Worth Kern, Augustus Newton Martin, John Lewis Griffiths, Francis Marion Dice, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy
Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1872
"With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies).
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Інші видання - Показати все
action agreed agreement alleged amount answer appellant appellee assessed assigned authority Bank bill bond brought cause cent charge circuit court claim commissioners Common Pleas complaint consideration constitution construction contract costs damages debt deed defendant demurrer dollars entitled error evidence exception execution facts filed finding flour follows fraud further give given granted ground held hundred dollars instructions interest issued John judgment jury land lots ment mortgage motion necessary notice objection opinion overruled owner paid paragraph party payment person petition plaintiff pleading possession presented proceeding proper purchaser question railroad reason received record reference refused rendered reversed road rule signed sold statute street sufficient suit sustained taken term thereof third thousand tion trial verdict vote witness
Сторінка 208 - We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. But we think the sound construction of the constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion, with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution,, which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it, in the manner most beneficial to the people.
Сторінка 29 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted. A person, with whom or in whose name, a contract is made for the benefit of another, is a trustee of an express trust, within the meaning of this section.
Сторінка 198 - As men, whose intentions require no concealment, generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said.
Сторінка 194 - This government is acknowledged by all to be one of enumerated powers. The principle, that it can exercise only the powers granted to it, would seem too apparent to have required to be enforced by all those arguments which its enlightened friends, while it was depending before the people, found it necessary to urge. That principle is now universally admitted.
Сторінка 223 - The General Assembly shall provide by law for a uniform and equal rate of assessment and taxation ; and shall prescribe such regulations as shall secure a just valuation for taxation of all property, both real and personal, excepting such only for municipal, educational, literary, scientific, religious or charitable purposes, as may be specially exempted by law.
Сторінка 469 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate.— 1873-345. 1085. It may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Сторінка 418 - ... such as to procure the person whose right to the office is contested to be declared elected when he had not received the highest number of legal votes.
Сторінка 440 - The court may determine any controversy between parties before it, when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of others, or by saving their rights ; but when a complete determination of the controversy cannot be had without the presence of other parties, the court must order them to be brought in.
Сторінка 216 - The true distinction, therefore, is, between the delegation of power to make the law, which necessarily involves a discretion as to what it shall be, and conferring an authority or discretion as to its execution, to be exercised under and in pursuance of the law. The first cannot be done; to the latter no valid objection can be made.