 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1914 - 768 стор.
...absolute bar to a subsequent action. It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding the parties and those in privity with them, not only...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1894 - 722 стор.
...concluding," in the language of Mr. Justice Field, in Cromwell v. Sac County, supra (at p. 352), " parties and those in privity with them, not only as...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Thus, for example, a judgment rendered upon a promissory note is conclusive as to the validity oi the... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1901 - 726 стор.
...action, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Wooster v. Cooper. 4. A power to dispose of lands given to be exercised inter vivos, will not be held... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1957 - 904 стор.
...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound "not only as to every matter which was offered and...purpose." Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351, 352. The judgment puts an end to the cause of action, which cannot again DO brought into litigation between... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1940 - 760 стор.
...absolute bar to a subsequent action. It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Thus, for example, a judgment rendered upon a promissory note is conclusive as to the validity of the... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1959 - 1028 стор.
...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound "not only as to every matter which was offered and...matter which might have been offered for that purpose." Gromwett v. County of Sac, 94 US 351, 352. The judgment puts an end to the cause of action, which cannot... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1957 - 1028 стор.
...are bound not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. The parties cannot relitlgate the cause of action in a new proceeding either before the same or any... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 стор.
...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound "not only as to every matter which was offered and...been offered for that purpose." Cromwell v. County of Sao, 94 US 351, 352. * • * But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1921 - 610 стор.
...settled law that a judgment between the same parties upon the same cause of action is res judicata — not only as to every matter which was offered and...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. (CromiceJl v. County of Sac, 94 US. 351. See also in re Cutler, 48 App. DC, 444 ; Black-ford v. Wilder,... | |
 | 1894 - 922 стор.
...absolute bar to a subsequent action. It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Thus, for example, a judgment rendered upon a promissory note is conclusive as to the validity of the... | |
| |
It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which... 
