A Study of ArcheologySouthern Illinois University Press, 1967 - 262 стор. Prompted by the need for a conceptual scheme of archeological research, A Study of Archeology deals with the development of the science from many diverse interests and the consequent confusion in its theoretical structure, aims, and relationships with other disciplines. The author has wisely avoided trying to create a rigidly contrived (and therefore unworkable) system for gathering, analyzing, and synthesizing archeological materials. Instead, he has concentrated on both destructive and constructive criticism, synthesizing from the two of them a single theory of archeology. Mr. Taylor labels his theory the "conjunctive approach," and he explains it carefully and illustratively as basic to valid cultural study. Professional archeologists and scholars in related fields will find that the book compels self-analysis, and its clarity of style and purpose makes it readily assimilative for general readers.--Cover |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 30
Сторінка 46
... discussion of the pottery of Pecos in the light of Shepard's findings ( Kidder , 1936b ) . But even here the tone is not so much one of analyzing and presenting the nature and the changes of the ceramic complex of a people , as it is ...
... discussion of the pottery of Pecos in the light of Shepard's findings ( Kidder , 1936b ) . But even here the tone is not so much one of analyzing and presenting the nature and the changes of the ceramic complex of a people , as it is ...
Сторінка 125
... discussion of Southwestern arch- eology . Both parties to this quarrel seem to be off the mark : the " splitters , " proceeding from their starting point of descriptive analysis , make the mistake of assuming without demonstration that ...
... discussion of Southwestern arch- eology . Both parties to this quarrel seem to be off the mark : the " splitters , " proceeding from their starting point of descriptive analysis , make the mistake of assuming without demonstration that ...
Сторінка 194
... discussion along these lines may be segregated in a separate section or incor- porated with the preceding one , either following or being interlarded with the pertinent empirical data . Close physical proximity of these two aspects ...
... discussion along these lines may be segregated in a separate section or incor- porated with the preceding one , either following or being interlarded with the pertinent empirical data . Close physical proximity of these two aspects ...
Зміст
PART | 3 |
History or Anthropology? | 23 |
An Analysis of Americanist Archeology in the United States | 43 |
5 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
actual American analysis Ancient anthropology appear approach archeological archeologist artifacts aspects association attempt basis behavior bone called cave ceramic chapter chronological classification comparative complex concept concerned consists construction cultural anthropology cultural context deal defined definition descriptive detailed discipline empirical evidence example excavation fact factors field give given historiography human idea important included indicate individual inferences influence Institution interest interpretation Italy Kidder knowledge later least less lines lists material Maya means merely method nature Notes objects particular past patterns phenomena picture possible pottery practice present problems procedure publications reason record reference regard relation relationships remains represent Room says Science seems significance similar single social Society specific specimens stone tion traits United University Webb whole writing York