American Law Reports Annotated, Том 159Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1945 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 69
Сторінка 121
... testimony as a whole could be received in the case did not ipso facto render admissible testimony otherwise inadmissible . Holding that the failure to object to improper cross - examination of a witness since deceased did not pre- clude ...
... testimony as a whole could be received in the case did not ipso facto render admissible testimony otherwise inadmissible . Holding that the failure to object to improper cross - examination of a witness since deceased did not pre- clude ...
Сторінка 122
... testimony of an interested wit- ness a reason why it should be re- peated . There is no force in the posi- tion that a party who has used a wit- ness interested against him should afterwards , on a second trial , be es- topped from ...
... testimony of an interested wit- ness a reason why it should be re- peated . There is no force in the posi- tion that a party who has used a wit- ness interested against him should afterwards , on a second trial , be es- topped from ...
Сторінка 1502
... testimony , the opposing party may cross- examine the offered witness , in the absence of the jury , if so desired , in order to test his ability to remember accurately and re- late truthfully the testimony sought to be reproduced by ...
... testimony , the opposing party may cross- examine the offered witness , in the absence of the jury , if so desired , in order to test his ability to remember accurately and re- late truthfully the testimony sought to be reproduced by ...
Зміст
Ind 30 Ferguson v Stafford 1870 | 15 |
Conroy 1883 92 Ind 464 47 Am | 31 |
A 740 Jones v Erie W Valley | 33 |
Авторські права | |
5 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
action admission affirmed annotation App Div appeared appellant applied Asso broker cause certificate charge child claim compensation competent constitutional contract corporation corpus delicti cross-examination death deceased decedent deed defendant defendant's dence duty effect eral error erty evidence ex rel expert fact fendant FIDELITY-PHILADELPHIA TRUST Co foreclosure Headnote held Idaho income injury insured interest judgment juror jury knowledge land lien lis pendens listing contract market value marriage ment Mo App mortgage NE2d ness opinion owner party payment person plaintiff proceeding proof prop purchaser qualified question railroad real estate real-estate residence rule sentence settlor sheriff's deed sion St Rep statute statute of frauds stockholders suicide supra SW2d tenant testify testimony Tex Civ App tion trial court trust trust instrument W. R. Co witness writ