Weekly Notes of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the County Courts of Philadelphia, and the United States District and Circuit Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Том 3Kay & Brother, 1877 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-5 із 84
Сторінка 8
... question of his agency . Kennard v . Railroad , 1 Phila . 41 . The action of the Court below in discharging the rule to show cause why judgment should not be opened cannot be reviewed , for opening such a judgment is discretionary with ...
... question of his agency . Kennard v . Railroad , 1 Phila . 41 . The action of the Court below in discharging the rule to show cause why judgment should not be opened cannot be reviewed , for opening such a judgment is discretionary with ...
Сторінка 13
... question to the collection of the principal debt of $ 12,750 , with lawful interest and costs , PER- SHING , P. J. ... question before us has never been decided in this State . In Verner v . Carson ( 16 P. F. Sm . 440 ) , the question ...
... question to the collection of the principal debt of $ 12,750 , with lawful interest and costs , PER- SHING , P. J. ... question before us has never been decided in this State . In Verner v . Carson ( 16 P. F. Sm . 440 ) , the question ...
Сторінка 14
... question of distribution , the auditor decided that judgment creditors could question the validity of a prior judgment on the ground of usury , and reduced a usurious judgment accord- ingly . This was affirmed by the Supreme Court ...
... question of distribution , the auditor decided that judgment creditors could question the validity of a prior judgment on the ground of usury , and reduced a usurious judgment accord- ingly . This was affirmed by the Supreme Court ...
Сторінка 15
... question testify that they have no cause of complaint , and desire it to be paid according to its terms . which we think decisive . This is not a case of dis- tribution . The defendant in error does not claim as a creditor . He claims ...
... question testify that they have no cause of complaint , and desire it to be paid according to its terms . which we think decisive . This is not a case of dis- tribution . The defendant in error does not claim as a creditor . He claims ...
Сторінка 18
... question of forfeiture . That they did not suspend the policy - which they could not legally do - is shown by their receipt of the assessment on similar policies between the date of the fire , 27 January , and the date of the extension ...
... question of forfeiture . That they did not suspend the policy - which they could not legally do - is shown by their receipt of the assessment on similar policies between the date of the fire , 27 January , and the date of the extension ...
Інші видання - Показати все
Weekly Notes of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of ..., Том 5 Повний перегляд - 1878 |
Weekly Notes of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of ..., Том 31 Повний перегляд - 1898 |
Weekly Notes of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of ..., Том 30 Повний перегляд - 1892 |
Загальні терміни та фрази
action affidavit of defence affirmed agreement alleged amount Appeal April assigning for error Assumpsit attorney auditor Bank Barr bill Casey certiorari charge claim commissioners Common Pleas Commonwealth contract counsel County Court creditors death debt decedent decree deed defendant election entered entitled evidence execution executors facts filed fraud garnishees George Ege held Henry Deringer intent interest issue judgment for want jury land lien March March 24 ment mortgage opinion Orphans owner P. F. Smith paid parties payment petition Phila Philadelphia Philadelphia County plaintiff in error procedendo proceedings promissory note purchase Purd Quarter Sessions question real estate recover scire facias sheriff sheriff's sale sold statute Street sufficient suit taxes testator testimony thereof tion took this writ township tract trial trust usurious verdict WEEKLY NOTES witness writ of error
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 421 - The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging a rate of interest greater than is allowed by the preceding section, when knowingly done, shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon.
Сторінка 56 - Michigan, acknowledges itself to owe and for value received hereby promises to pay to the bearer hereof the sum of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS lawful money of the United States of America...
Сторінка 35 - If the title fairly gives notice of the subject of the act, so as reasonably to lead to an inquiry into the body of the bill, it is all that is necessary.
Сторінка 379 - Commonwealth; and any person convicted of wilful violation of the election laws shall, in addition to any penalties provided by law, be deprived of the right of suffrage absolutely for a term of four years.
Сторінка 202 - No creditor whose debt is provable shall be allowed to prosecute to final judgment any suit at law or in equity therefor against the bankrupt, until the question of the debtor's discharge shall have been determined ; and any such suit or proceedings shall, upon the application of the bankrupt, be stayed...
Сторінка 404 - Elizabeth, my well beloved wife, for and during the term of her natural life ; and from and immediately after her decease...
Сторінка 184 - Whereas by a warrant under the hand and seal of , (a) justice of the peace...
Сторінка 317 - If the part to be performed by one party consists of several distinct and separate items, and the price to be paid by the other is apportioned to each Item to be performed, or is left to be implied by law, such a contract will generally be held to be severable...
Сторінка 59 - No conviction shall be had in any prosecution for the publication of papers relating to the official conduct of officers or men in public capacity, or to any other matter proper for public investigation or information, where the fact that such publication was not maliciously or negligently made shall be established to the satisfaction of the jury...
Сторінка 392 - President, to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him; for what?