| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 стор.
...the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either. It can only be oppressive,...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable and void, on the ground of public policy, as being injurious to the interests of the public. The rule,... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 830 стор.
...the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either, it can only be oppressive;...the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the case above referred to, Lord Chief Justice Parker says, " A restraint to carry on a trade throughout... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 стор.
...restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is...the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the case above referred to, Lord Chief Justice Parker says — " a restraint to carry on a trade... | |
| Samuel Bealey Harrison, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Frederick Luard Wollaston - 1837 - 520 стор.
...the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either, it can only be oppressive...the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may indeed be said, that all such... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 стор.
...the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either: it can only be oppressive;...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable." That refers to the case of 1837. 1837. a party, having no interest in a trade, taking a bond from another... | |
| Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 стор.
...the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either — it can only be...interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In former times the judges spoke of these agreements with great disapprobation. Hall, J.,... | |
| 1839 - 474 стор.
...other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
| John William Smith - 1841 - 744 стор.
...the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive,...the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. No certain precise boundary can be... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1842 - 830 стор.
...Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either j it can only be oppressive ; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable." Applying that test here, is not the restraint — disabling the defendant from carrying on or being... | |
| Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - 1072 стор.
...the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive ; it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public... | |
| |