The John P. Branch Historical Papers of Randolph-Macon College, Том 2Randolph-Macon Historical Society, 1905 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-5 із 100
Сторінка 8
... Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia was established . Prior to this it had consisted of the three chancellors , the five judges of the General Court , and the three judges of the Admirality Court . From this time it was made a separate ...
... Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia was established . Prior to this it had consisted of the three chancellors , the five judges of the General Court , and the three judges of the Admirality Court . From this time it was made a separate ...
Сторінка 20
... Court decided for the defendant , Fairfax , and an appeal was taken . In the meantime , Fairfax died , and the ... Supreme Court heard the case , and reversed the decision of the State Court on the ground that the Acts of the Assembly ...
... Court decided for the defendant , Fairfax , and an appeal was taken . In the meantime , Fairfax died , and the ... Supreme Court heard the case , and reversed the decision of the State Court on the ground that the Acts of the Assembly ...
Сторінка 21
... Supreme Court commanding the Virginia Court of Appeals to reverse its decision the judges unanimously refused . Roane's opinion31 was especially strong , and was printed in the Richmond Enquirer February 16 , 1816 , under the heading ...
... Supreme Court commanding the Virginia Court of Appeals to reverse its decision the judges unanimously refused . Roane's opinion31 was especially strong , and was printed in the Richmond Enquirer February 16 , 1816 , under the heading ...
Сторінка 22
... Supreme Court of the United States to meddle with the judgment of this court in the case before us ; that this case does not come within the actual provisions of the twenty - fifth section of the Judicial Act , and that this court is ...
... Supreme Court of the United States to meddle with the judgment of this court in the case before us ; that this case does not come within the actual provisions of the twenty - fifth section of the Judicial Act , and that this court is ...
Сторінка 23
... Supreme Court answered , maintaining their former position and the constitutionality of the Judiciary Act . Both Story and Johnson gave opinions - Story the opinion of the court , Johnson because he did not entirely agree with the ...
... Supreme Court answered , maintaining their former position and the constitutionality of the Judiciary Act . Both Story and Johnson gave opinions - Story the opinion of the court , Johnson because he did not entirely agree with the ...
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
26th Congress admitted adopted Algernon Sidney amendment American appeal authority bill Calhoun cause citizens claims compact confederacy confederation Congress Constitution construction Convention decided decision declared delegated Democratic doctrine effect elected eleventh amendment England ernment established execution existence favor federal courts Federal Government Federalist friends give given granted Hugh Mercer Hunter independence JAMES MONROE Jefferson JOHN TAYLOR judges judgment judicial Judiciary jurisdiction justice land legislative Legislature letter liberty limited Madison means measure ment Mercer Missouri Compromise necessary and proper object opinion orator paper party Patrick Henry peace plaintiff in error political preme Court President principles question RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE relation republican resolution respect Roane's Senate session slavery South Southern sovereign sovereignty SPENCER ROANE stitution Supreme Court TAYLOR TO JAMES territory tion treaty tribunal Union United usurpation Virginia vote Washington Whigs words writ of error
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 99 - That the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions, as of the mode and measure of redress.
Сторінка 49 - States are parties, as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting that compact; as no further valid than they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers not granted by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right and are in duty bound to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities,...
Сторінка 99 - That to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming as to itself, the other party: "That the Government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself...
Сторінка 80 - This species infests a great variety of plants, and is to be found throughout our country from the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico and from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
Сторінка 98 - In a free government the security for civil rights must be the same as that for religious rights. It consists in the one case in the multiplicity of interests, and in the other in the multiplicity of sects.
Сторінка 97 - It appears to your committee to be a plain principle, founded in common sense, illustrated by common practice, and essential to the nature of compacts, that where resort can be had to no tribunal, superior to the authority of the parties, the parties themselves must be the rightful judges in the last resort, whether the bargain made has been pursued or violated.
Сторінка 65 - ... general welfare, and for which, under that description, an appropriation of money is requisite and proper. And there seems to be no room for a doubt that whatever concerns the general interests of learning, of agriculture, of manufactures, and of commerce are within the sphere of the national councils, as far as regards an application of money.
Сторінка 85 - Whenever, therefore, a question arises concerning the constitutionality of a particular power, the first question is, whether the power be expressed in the Constitution. If it be, the question is decided. If it be not expressed, the next inquiry must be, whether it is properly an incident to an express power and necessary to its execution. If it be, then it may be exercised by Congress. If not, Congress cannot exercise it.
Сторінка 98 - Resolved, that the several states composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government ; but that by compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States...
Сторінка 27 - They contain the true principles of the revolution of 1800, for that was as real a revolution in the principles of our government as that of 1776 was in its form ; not effected indeed by the sword, as that, but by the rational and peaceable instrument of reform, the suffrage of the people.