...accounts. Secondly, that the loss proved was by a felony, and not by the negligence of the defendants. The learned Judge left it to the jury to say, whether there was a special contract to carry goods of this description sent by Walker at the ordinary rate of carriage,...

...defendant, on a motion for a new trial, that there was no .evidence of a publication in Leicestershire. The learned judge left it to the jury to say, whether there had been a publication in Leicestershire, by an open delivery of the libel. The question and the principles...

...assignment of the tree by the bailiff to Fisher was fraudulent; but he having failed to prove that fact, the learned Judge left it to the Jury to say, whether there had been a sufficient delivery of the tree to Fisher by the bailiff, according to the custom of the country?...

...of felony, so as to justify his apprehending and taking her to a place of custody. In Hill v. Yates, the learned Judge left it to the Jury to say, whether there was probable cause for the apprehension of the plaintiff; but, at the same time, intimated it as his...

...clearly appeared to be the property of a person named Plumley, and not of the plaintiff. On this evidence the learned Judge left it to the jury to say, whether there had been a surrender by Keel to the Duke of his interest in the close ; and stated his opinion to be, that a...

...he still held the glebe land ; but that he had paid no rent for it, none being due until Michaelmas. The learned judge left it to the jury to say whether there had been a surrender by Keel to the duke, expressing his opinion, that the assent of Mr. Cockburn to the substituted...

...clearly appeared to be the property of a person named Plumley, and not of the plaintiff. On this evidence the learned Judge left it to the jury to say, whether there had been a surrender by Keel to the Duke of his interest in the close; and stated his opinion to be, that a...

...penetration, and distinctly proved emission, but not during penetration, the prisoner having been interrupted. The learned JUDGE left it to the jury to say, whether there had been penetration, stating that, if so, the crime was complete under the new act. The jury were of opinion...

...at the time of the giving of the guarantae having then for the first time come to their knowledge. The learned judge left it to the jury, to say whether there was fraud on the plaintiffs' part in keeping from the defendant the knowledge of Packer's liabilities...

...penetration, and distinctly proved emission, but not during penetration, the prisoner having been interrupted. The learned Judge left it to the jury to say, whether there had been penetration, stating that, if so, the crime was complete under the new act. The jury were of opinion...