Зображення сторінки
PDF
ePub

it to one half its length, if the elastic limit of the material were such as to allow it to be so far elongated or compressed, the law of elasticity remaining the same.*

Now, suppose the bar, whose section is K square inches, to be made up of others of the same length L, each one inch in section; these will evidently be K in number, and the

Р

strain or the thrust upon each will be represented by K Moreover, each bar will be elongated or compressed, by this strain or thrust, by l feet; so that each foot of the length of it (being elongated or compressed by the same quantity as each other foot of its length) will be elongated or compressed

I'

by a quantity represented, in feet, by I. But to elongate or compress a foot of the length of one of these bars, by one foot, requires (by supposition) E pounds strain or thrust; to elongate or compress it by feet requires, therefore, EL pounds. But the strain or thrust which actually produces Р this elongation is pounds. Therefore,KEL· K

P

[blocks in formation]

347. To find the number of units of work expended upon the elongation by a given quantity (l) of a bar whose section is K and its length L.

x

If a represent any elongation of the bar ( being a part of ), then is the strain P corresponding to that elongation.

KE

represented (equation 485) by ; therefore the work done in elongating the bar through the small additional

KE

[ocr errors]

space Ar, is represented by (considering the strain

L

to remain the same through the small space Ax); and the

*The value of E in respect to any material is called the modulus of its elasticity. The value of the moduli of elasticity of the principal materials of con. struction have been determined by experiment, and will be found in a table at the end of the volume.

whole work U done is, on this supposition, represented by KE L Ex, or (supposing A to be infinitely small) by

[blocks in formation]

KE

348. By equation (485) P=, therefore U = Pl; † whence it follows that the work of elongating the bar is one half that which would have been required to elongate it by the same quantity, if the resistance opposed to its elongation had been, throughout, the same as its extreme elongation 7. If, therefore, the whole strain P corresponding to the elongation had been put on at once, then, when the elongation had been attained, twice as much work would have been done upon the bar as had been expended upon its elasticity. This work would therefore have been accumulated in the bar, and in the body producing the strain under which it yields; and if both had been free to move on (as, for instance, when the strain of the bar is produced by a weight suspended freely from its extremity), then would this accumulated work have been just sufficient yet further to elongate the bar by the same distance 7, which whole elongation of 27 could not have remained; because the strain upon the bar is only that necessary to keep it elongated by . The extremity of the bar would therefore, under these circumstances, have oscillated on either side of that point which corresponds to the elongation .

The mechanical principle involved in this result has numerous applications; one of these is to the effect of a sudden variation of the pressure on a mercurial column. The pressure of such a column varying directly with its elevation or depression, follows the same law as the elasticity of a bar; whence it follows that if any pressure be thrown at once or instantaneously upon the surface of the mercury, the variation of the height of the column will be twice that which it would receive from an equal pressure gradually accumulated. Some singular errors appear to have resulted from a neglect of this principle in the discussion of experiments upon the pressure of steam, made with the mercurial column. No such pressure can of course be made to operate, in the mathematical sense of the term, instantaneously; and the term gradually has a relative meaning. All that is meant is, that a certain relation must obtain between the rate of the increase of the pressure and the amplitude of the motion, so that when the pressure no longer increases the motion may

cease.

349. Eliminating / between equations (485) and (486), we obtain

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

whence it appears that the work expended upon the elonga tion of a bar under any strain varies directly as the square of the strain and the length of the bar, and inversely as the area of its section.*

THE MODULI OF RESILIENCE AND FRAGILITY.

2

(4)KL (equation 486), it is evident

350. Since U=E()

that the different amounts of work which must be done upon different bars of the same material to elongate them by equal

fractional parts (1).

are to one another as the product KL.

Let now two such bars be supposed to have sustained that fractional elongation which corresponds to their elastic limit; let U. represent the work which must have been done upon the one to bring it to this elongation, and M. that upon the other: and let the section of the latter bar be one square inch and its length one foot; then evidently

U.=M.KL... . . (488).

M. is in this case called the modulus of longitudinal resili ence.t

It is evidently a measure of that resistance which the material of the bar opposes to a strain in the nature of an impact, tending to elongate it beyond its elastic limits.

If My be taken to represent the work which must be similarly done upon a bar one foot long and one square inch in section to produce fracture, it will be a measure of that resistance which the bar opposes to fracture under the like circumstances, and which resistance is opposed to its fra

From this formula may be determined the amount of work expended prejudicially upon the elasticity of rods used for transmitting work in machinery, under a reciprocating motion-pump rods, for instance. A sudden effort of the pressure transmitted in the nature of an impact may make the loss of work double that represented by the formula; the one limit being the minimum, and the other the maximum, of the possible loss.

The term "modulus of resilience" appears first to have been used by Mr. Tredgold in his work on "the Strength of Cast Iron," Art. 804.

gility; it may therefore be distinguished from the last mentioned as the modulus of fragility. If U represent the work which must be done upon a bar whose section is K square inches and its length L feet to produce fracture; then, as before,

[blocks in formation]

If P. and P represent respectively the strains which would elongate a bar, whose length is L feet and section K inches, to its elastic limits and to rupture; then, equation (487),

[blocks in formation]

These equations serve to determine the values of the moduli M, and Myby experiment.*

351. The elongation of a bar suspended vertically, and sustaining a given strain in the direction of its length, the influence of its own weight being taken into the account.

Let x represent any length of the bar before its elongation, Ar an element of that length, L the whole length of the bar before elongation, w the weight of each foot of its length, and K its section. Also let the length x have become a, when the bar is elongated, under the strain P and its own weight. The length of the bar, below the point whose distance from the point of suspension was a before the elongation, having then been L-, and the weight of that portion of the bar remaining unchanged by its elongation, it is still represented by (L-x) w. Now this weight, increased by P, constitutes the strain upon the element Ar; its elongation under this strain is therefore represented (equation 485) by P+(L-x)w Ax, and the length Ax, of the element when thus

ΚΕ

The experiments required to this determination, in respect to the principal materials of construction, have been made, and are to be found in the published papers of Mr. Hodgkinson and Mr. Barlow. A table of the moduli of resilience and fragility, collected from these valuable data, is a desideratum in practical science.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Integrating between the limits 0 and L, and representing by L, the length of the elongated rod,

[blocks in formation]

If the strain be converted into a thrust, P must be made 'to assume the negative sign; and if this thrust equal one half the weight of the bar, there will be no elongation at all.

352. THE VERTICAL OSCILLATIONS

OF AN ELASTIC ROD OR
FROM ITS

CORD SUSTAINING A GIVEN WEIGHT

EXTREMITY.

SUSPENDED

Let A represent the point of suspension of the rod (fig. 1. on the next page), L its length AB before its elongation, and the elongation produced in it by a given weight W suspended from its extremity, and C the corresponding position of the extremity of the rod.

Let the rod be conceived to be elongated through an additional distance CD=e by the application of any other given strain, and then allowed to oscillate freely, carrying with it the weight W; and let P be any position of its extremity during any one of the oscillations which it will thus be made to perform. If, then, CP be represented by æ, the corresponding elongation BP of the rod will be represented by +, and the strain which would retain it permanently at this elongation (equation 485) by L (+); the unbalanced pressure or moving force (Art. 92.) upon the weight W, at the period of this elongation, will therefore be

ΚΕ

ΚΕ

KE represented by (+2)-W, or by ; since W, being

L

L

the strain which would retain the rod at the elongation, is

KE
L

represented by (equation 485).

*Whewell's Analytical Statics, p. 113.

« НазадПродовжити »