 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 стор.
...risk of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." This provision was simply declaratory of the law as already determined by this court in Sipes v. Starch... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 806 стор.
...section 4; that is to say, 'any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of the employee.' " 188 185 MICHIGAN REPORTS. [Mar. Counsel for appellee, we think very properly, called... | |
 | 1915 - 880 стор.
...risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee," what would be the effect of the maxim? It would be that those "risks of his employment" which do not... | |
 | Missouri. Supreme Court - 1917 - 940 стор.
...of his own employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." In all other cases the defense lies, if the facts authorize it. [Fish v. Railroad, 263 Mo. 106.] Here... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1920 - 1130 стор.
...assumption of risk " in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee," do not apply. KILET, J., dissents, with memorandum. APPEAL by the defendant, Lehigh Valley Railroad... | |
 | Michigan State Bar Association - 1905 - 708 стор.
...risk of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employees. This act further provides that no contract of employment, insurance, relief benefit or indemnity... | |
 | Charles Richmond Henderson - 1908 - 472 стор.
...risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee. SEC. 5. That any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall... | |
 | Charles Richmond Henderson - 1908 - 472 стор.
...risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee. SEC. 5. That any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever. the purpose or intent of which shall... | |
 | Massachusetts. Department of Labor and Industries. Division of Statistics - 1908 - 368 стор.
...have assumed the risk of his employment in any case where the violation by the carrier of any statute for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of the employee. Any contract, rule, regulation, or device to enable the carrier to exempt itself from... | |
| |
Provided, That no such employee who may be injured or killed shall be held to have been guilty of contributory negligence in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury... 
