 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 806 стор.
...in intrastate commerce. It was said that the test was: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" And that question was answered in the negative, and the State board's award was affirmed. In New York... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 800 стор.
...A. 1916C, 797), where it is stated that the question is: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" The car upon which the plaintiff was employed went from one State into the other, and the plaintiff... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1921 - 688 стор.
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in -interstate transportation or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" (Shanks v. Delaisxire, Lackaivantta and Western Railroad Co. 239 US 556.) We are supported in our conclusion... | |
 | 1916 - 506 стор.
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, Was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?' Manifestly there was no such close or direct relation to interstate transportation in the taking of... | |
 | 1917 - 510 стор.
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, Was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?"8 The work of some employes, however, has a broader connection with the entire operation of the... | |
 | 1918 - 502 стор.
...the business of interstate commerce as substantially to form a part or a necessary inciof the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically part of it?"2 Most railroad tracks are used in both interstate and intrastate commerce, but when so... | |
 | 1920 - 496 стор.
...test being whether at the time of the injury the employe was engaged in interstate transportation or work so closely related to It as to be practically a part thereof. — Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 111., 1-5 N. E. 748. 21. ContractH... | |
 | 1928 - 1130 стор.
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it" See, also, Chicago, Burlington & QRR v. Harrington, 241 US 177, 36 S. Ct. 517, 60 L. Ed. 941. In Pedersen... | |
 | 1920 - 2100 стор.
...could be opened to permit taking out freight for delivery to consignees, held to have been employed in interstate transportation, or In work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of It, and within employers' liability Act April 22. 190S, § 1 (Comp. St § 8657). 2. MASTER AND SERVANT... | |
 | 1921 - 2116 стор.
...is whether the evidence discloses that the plaintiff was engaged in interstate commerce at the time, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, and thus be entitled to the benefits of the federal Employers' Liability Act (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665).... | |
| |
Was the employee at the time of the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. 
