Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural ReligionAgora Publications, Inc., 12 груд. 2004 р. - 170 стор. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion is a philosophical work by the Scottish philosopher David Hume. Through dialogue, three philosophers named Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes debate the nature of God's existence. Whether or not these names reference specific philosophers, ancient or otherwise, remains a topic of scholarly dispute. While all three agree that a god exists, they differ sharply in opinion on God's nature or attributes and how, or if, humankind can come to knowledge of a deity. |
Зміст
5 | |
Part 2 | 23 |
Part 3 | 43 |
Part 4 | 53 |
Part 5 | 63 |
Part 6 | 71 |
Part 7 | 81 |
Part 8 | 91 |
Part 9 | 101 |
Part 10 | 109 |
Part 11 | 127 |
Part 12 | 147 |
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
absolutely abstruse absurd adjusted admit Aeneid analogy ancient animal anthropomorphism Antoine Arnauld appear argument arrangement art and design ascribe atheists attributes benevolence circumstances claim Cleanthes common concerning conclusion conjecture consider contradiction Copernican system creatures deity Demea difficulties dispute divine doubt effects entirely Epicurus established eternity evil existence existence of God experience faculties finite God's greater happiness Hermippus Hesiod Human legs human mind human reason humankind hypothesis ideas ignorance imagine imperfect impossible incomprehensible inference infinite intelligence kind least Leibniz limited Malebranche matter melancholy misery moral motion natural theology never objections observe operations opinion origin pain Pamphilus perfect phenomena Philo philosophical philosophical skepticism pleasure possible present pretend principles priori produce proof prove religious reproduction resemblance Samuel Clarke seems sense sentiments skepticism sophism species spirit superstition suppose supreme theism theogony theology theory things thought true truth universe unknown vegetation whole
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 11 - Of good and evil much they argued then, Of happiness and final misery, Passion and apathy, and glory and shame, Vain wisdom all, and false philosophy: Yet with a pleasing sorcery could charm Pain for a while, or anguish, and excite Fallacious hope, or arm the obdured' breast With stubborn patience as with triple steel.