 | Samuel Hazard - 1833 - 472 стор.
...congress in 1791 decided in favour of a bank; another in 1811 decided against it. One congress in 1815, decided against a bank, another in 1816 decided in...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. • If the opinion of... | |
 | Philo Ashley Goodwin - 1832 - 446 стор.
...Congress in 1791 decided in favor of a Bank ; another in 181 1 decided against it- One Congress in 1816, decided against a Bank; another in 1816 decided in...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | Philo Ashley Goodwin - 1832 - 448 стор.
...; another in 181 1 decided against «• One Congress in 1815, decided against a Bank ; anoI th.er in 1816 decided in its favor. Prior to the present...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1833 - 712 стор.
...congress in J791 decided in favor of a bank; another in 1811 decided against it. One congress in 1815, decided against a bank, another in 1816 decided in...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1833 - 708 стор.
...congress in 1791 decided in favor of a bank; another in 1811 decided against it. One congress in 1815, decided against a bank, another in 1816 decided in...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | Philo Ashley Goodwin - 1833 - 484 стор.
...Congress in 1791 decided in favor of a Bank ; another in 1811 decided against it- One Congress in 1815, decided against a Bank; another in 1816 decided in...Judicial, and Executive opinions against the Bank, hav« heen probably to those in its favor, as four to one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore,... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1833 - 710 стор.
...congress in 1791 decided in favor of a bank; another in 1811 decided against it. One congress in IS 15, decided against a bank, another in 1816 decided in...the states, the expressions of legislative, judicial end executive opinions against the bank, have been probably to those in its favor as four to one. There... | |
 | Andrew Jackson - 1835 - 292 стор.
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided...— There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | Timothy Pitkin - 1835 - 628 стор.
...against it. One Congress in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided in favor. Priorlo the present Congress, therefore, the precedents drawn...and executive opinions against the bank, have been, prubably, to those in its favor, as four to one. There is nothing, in precedent, therefore, which,... | |
 | United States. President (1829-1837 : Jackson) - 1837 - 460 стор.
...in 1791, decided in favor of a bank ; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank ; another, in 1816, decided...against the bank, have been, probably, to those in its faror as four to one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted,... | |
| |
... acquiescence of the people and the states can be considered as well settled. So far from this being the case on this subject, an argument against the bank might be based on precedent. One Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in... 
