Bombay High Court Reports: Reports of Cases Decided in the High Court of Bombay. I-XII, 1862-1875, Том 11Printed at the Education Society's Press, Byculla, 1875 |
Загальні терміни та фрази
admitted adoption Ahmedabad alleged appeal was argued APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION application Assistant Judge attaching creditor Bábáji Beng BHA'U NA'NA'JI UTPA'T Bombay Calc charge Civil Procedure Code co-parceners Code of Criminal confession conviction and sentence Court of Session Criminal Procedure debt deceased decision defendant defendant's Dhirajlál Mathurádás Dhondu District Judge entitled execution execution-creditor fact family property family usage father Government Pleader Govind ground H. C. Rep heard by WEST heirs held High Court Hindu law Indian Evidence Act Indian Penal Code judgment judgment-creditor judgment-debtor land liable Limitation Act Magistrate MATHURA ment MORESHVAR mortgage mortgagor NA'RA'YAN offence opinion parties Pátil payment pendente lite plaintiff possession prisoner proceedings purchaser question Rango Rávji rent respondent reversing the decree rule Sakhárám Satara Section Session Judge share Small Cause Court sold special appeal statement Subordinate Judge SUNDRA'BA'I tion trial undivided undivided family Utpát VITHAL WESTROPP witnesses
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 244 - Provided that, when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence in the custody of a police officer...
Сторінка 268 - Law, is not so much to enquire whether a disputed doctrine is fairly deducible from the earliest authorities, as to ascertain whether it has been received by the particular School which governs the district with which he has to deal, and has there been sanctioned by usage. For under the Hindu system of law clear proof of usage will outweigh the written text of the law.
Сторінка 84 - That is an authority to show that ancestral property which descended to a father under the Mitakshara law is not exempted from liability to pay his debts because a son is born to him. It would be a pious duty on the part of the son to pay his father's debts, and it being the pious duty to pay his father's debts, the ancestral property, in which the son, as the son of his father, acquires an interest by birth, is liable to the father's debts.
Сторінка 103 - In every trial before a Court of Session, the prosecution shall be conducted by the Public Prosecutor, Government Pleader or by some other officer specially empowered by the Magistrate of the District in that behalf.
Сторінка 123 - By proof that the witness has been bribed, or has accepted the offer of a bribe, or has received any other corrupt inducement to give his evidence ; (3) By proof of former statements inconsistent with any part of his evidence which is liable to be contradicted...
Сторінка 27 - ... a particular estate, the necessities of mankind require that the decision of the Court in the suit shall be binding, not only on the litigant parties, but also on those who derive title under them by alienations made pending the suit, whether such alienees had or had not notice of the pending proceedings. If this were not so, there could be no certainty that the litigation would ever come to an end.
Сторінка 94 - Generally speaking, it is not competent to a prosecutor to prove a man guilty of one felony, by proving him guilty of another unconnected felony ; but where several felonies are connected together, and form part of one entire transaction, then the one is evidence to show the character of the other.
Сторінка 67 - Suit ; that it gives no better Right, having no Effect with reference to any beneficial Result against the Plaintiff in that Suit ; and it is very reasonable, that the litigating Parties should be exempted from the Necessity of taking Notice of a Title, acquired under such Circumstances. With regard to them it is as if it had never existed : otherwise Suits would be indeterminable ; if one Party pending the Suit could by conveying to others create a Necessity for introducing new Parties. The voluntary...
Сторінка 145 - Bennett, and we are unable to say that the finding is not supported by the evidence.
Сторінка 93 - In point of law, there is no objection to a man being tried on one indictment for several offences of the same sort. It is usual, in felonies, for the Judge, in his discretion, to call upon the counsel for the prosecution to select one felony, and to confine themselves to that ; but this practice has never been extended to misdemeanors.