The Good Life: Alternatives in Ethics
Rowman & Littlefield, 2001 - 305 стор.
The Good Life contains an exposition and critique of the various ideals in living that have been advocated by major philosophers and schools of thought. In addition, the ethical problems of egoism, determinism, and relativism are explained and evaluated in both their classic Greek form and in the deconstruction of post-modernism. The ideals that are discussed include hedonism as described by the Cyrenaics and Epicureans, and the Utilitarianism of Bentham and Mill; the naturalistic ethic of the Stoics, the Transcendentalists, the evolutionists, and the back-to-nature movement; the biblical ethic of Judaism and Christianity as well as the Eastern religions of Confucianism and Buddhism; and the Kantian ideal of duty and virtue ethics, including feminist theory. To illuminate various conceptions of the good life, multiple examples are drawn from contemporary life, including the abortion issue, racism, capital punishment, and multiculturalism.
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
accept according achieve actions activities animals appears approach argument Aristotle basic become behavior believe called character choose Christian claim commit concept concerned conduct consequences considerations considered consists criticism culture decide desire determinism doctrine emotions essential ethics example existence experience fact factors feel follow forces function give goal happiness hedonism human ideal ideas important individual intention judged judgments justice justified Kant kind living logical maintain matter means mind moral nature necessarily never objects obligations occur ourselves pain particular perhaps person philosophy pleasure position practice present principles problem psychological question rational realize reason referred regard relation religious responsibility result rule seems sense situation social society species standards suffering theory things thought tion true truth understanding universe values various virtue wrong