 The presumption of law is not lightly to be repelled. It is not to be broken in upon, or shaken by a mere balance of probability. The evidence for the purpose of repelling it must be strong, distinct, satisfactory and conclusive.  Miscellaneous Reports. Cases Decided in the Courts of Record of the State of ... - Сторінка 121автори: New York (State). Courts, Francis Blaine Delehanty (Reporter), Austin B. Griffin (Reporter), Robert George Scherer (Reporter), Edward Jordan Dimock (Reporter), Joseph Albert Lawson (Reporter), Charles Cook Lester (Reporter), William Van Rensselaer Erving (Reporter), Louis J. Rezzemini (Reporter) - 1908Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1902 - 894 стор.
...Davies, 5 Cl. & F. 265, was adopted. Speaking of the presumption of law in that connection, he says: "It is not to be broken in upon or shaken by a mere...be strong, distinct, satisfactory and conclusive." Applying that rule to the case in hand, I am bound to presume that Mrs. Barrett, then Miss Maloney,... | |
 | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords - 1841 - 820 стор.
...I now feel, that shaken Ky . mere propresumption of law is not lightly to be repelled. It babiiity. is not to be broken in upon, or shaken by a mere balance...be strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive. The question is, therefore, whether the facts of this case are sufficient to repel that presumption.... | |
 | Leonard Shelford - 1841 - 532 стор.
...mere balance of probabilities.(a) The presumption of law is not lightly to be repelled ; it cannot be broken in upon or shaken by a mere balance of probability...be strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive, and such as will lead the mind to the clear conviction that the child in question was not the child... | |
 | 1849 - 608 стор.
...f. Dane*, 5 Cl. & Finn. 163, where Lord Lyndhnrst had said, "The presumption in favour of marriage is not lightly to be repelled. It is not to be broken...be strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive." Applying that rule to the circumstances of this case, which had been ably and fully argued before their... | |
 | Edward Burtenshaw Sugden - 1849 - 830 стор.
...observed that the presumption of law [in favour of legitimacy] was not lightly to be repelled. It was not to be broken in upon or shaken by a mere balance...be strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive (g). 7- A father has of course the right to the care and custody of his children ; he is intrusted... | |
 | Alexander Warfield Bradford, New York (State). Surrogate's Court (New York County) - 1857 - 570 стор.
...seemed to adopt the doctrine laid down by Lord Lyndhurst in Morris vs. Davies, 5 Cl. & Fin., 163, that " the presumption of law is not lightly to be repelled...be strong, distinct, satisfactory and conclusive." Or as Lord Cottenhain stated the proposition, " A presumption of this sort in favor of a marriage,... | |
 | 1858 - 660 стор.
...case, Lord Cottenham adopts the principle laid down by Lord Lyndhurst in Morris v. Davies (»'), that " the presumption of law is " not lightly to be repelled...be strong, distinct, satisfactory and conclusive." Lord Brougham and Lord Campbell affirm that view. As to the evidence offered of reputation of Henry... | |
 | Ireland. High Court of Chancery - 1858 - 656 стор.
...case, Lord Cottenham adopts the principle laid down by Lord Lyndhurst in Morris v. Davies (t), that " the presumption of law is " not lightly to be repelled...be strong, distinct, satisfactory and conclusive." Lord Brougham and Lord Campbell affirm that view. As to the evidence offered of reputation of Henry... | |
 | Joseph Goodeve - 1862 - 776 стор.
...the law connected with this subject ; at the same time, as I before expressed, and I now feel, that presumption of law is not lightly to be repelled....strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive."^ Of course adequate proof of impotency would always be conclusive ; Relative amount of but apart from... | |
 | 1883 - 552 стор.
...repelled only by the most cogent and satisfactory evidence to the contrary. In Morris v. Dairies, 6 Clk. & Fin. 163, Lord Lyndhurst, speaking of this presumption,...strong, distinct, satisfactory and conclusive." In Piers v. Piers, 2 HL Cas. 331. Lord Campbell said that the presumption could be negatived only "by... | |
| |
