 In the last class of cases it must distinctly appear that the invention covered by the later patent was a separate invention, distinctly different and independent from that covered by the first patent; in other words, it must be something substantially...  Electrical Engineer - Сторінка 1171894Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | 1894 - 1266 стор.
...claim, more generical In Its character, than the specific claims, contained in the prior patent, to also void; but that where the second patent covers...absolutely void. It Is Insisted on the part of the appellee e that "whether this Invention shall be protect-* ed In part of Its features by one'patent, and» as... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1894 - 782 стор.
...could not use the first, or the one with the earlier number, to help sustain the action. In Odiorne v. Amesbury Nail Factory, 2 Mason, 28, the reason...shall be protected in part of its features by one MILLER v. EAGLE M AN UF ACT U RING CO. 199 Opinion of the Court. patent, and as to the rest by another,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1894 - 796 стор.
...covers matter described in the prior patent, essentially distinct and separable from the invemtion covered thereby and claims made thereunder, its validity...shall be protected in part of its features by one Opinion of the Court. patent, and as to the rest by another, or shall be completely protected by a... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1895 - 784 стор.
...comprehended in the first patent. It must consist in something more than a mere distinction of the breadth and scope of the claims of each patent If the case comes...•whether this invention shall be protected in part of its feature* by one patent, and u to the rest by another, or shall be completely protected by a single... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1896 - 896 стор.
...than :i men1 distinction of the breadth and scope of the claims of each patent. If the case cornea within the first or second of the above classes, the second patent is absolutely void. And this is so regardless of the material of which the machine may be constructed. If, therefore, as... | |
 | 1897 - 808 стор.
...words, it must be something substantially different from that comprehended in the first patent, ft must. consist in something more than a mere distinction...above classes, the second patent is absolutely void." Under this decision the contention of the appellee that the patent Mo. 272,238 is an older patent than... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1899 - 794 стор.
...different from that comprehended in the first pntent. It must consist in something more than a more distinction of the breadth or scope of the claims...shall be protected in part of its features by one Opinion of the Court. patent, and as to the rest by another, or shall be completely protected by a... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1901 - 1108 стор.
...of cases it must distinctly appear that the invention covered by the later patent was a se pa rate invention, distinctly different and independent from...that "whether this invention shall be protected in 199]part of Us/¿aíure«by one 'patent, and as to the rest by another, or "shall be completely protected... | |
 | Walter Forwood Rogers - 1914 - 902 стор.
...substantially different from that comprehended in the first patent. It must consist in something more than mere distinction of the breadth or scope of the claims...above classes, the second patent is absolutely void." The practice of the Patent Office was stated by Commissioner Hall in Ex parte Roberts, 40 OG 543, and... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1922 - 1044 стор.
...In the last class of cases it must distinctly appear that the invention covered by the luierpateut was a separate invention, distinctly different and...that "whether this invention shall be protected in 199]part of its/eaíurííby one 'patent, and as to the rest by another, or shall be completely protected... | |
| |
