 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1910 - 726 стор.
...result if a new trial is granted; (2) it must have been discovered since the trial; (3) it must be such as could not have been discovered before the trial...due diligence; (4) it must be material to the issue; and (5) it must not be merely cumulative to the evidence offered on the tria1. Strictly speaking, the... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 714 стор.
...the result if a new trial is granted; that it must have been discovered since the trial and be such as could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence; that it must be material to the issues and must not be merely cumulative to the evidence offered on... | |
 | 1922 - 624 стор.
...discovered since the trial; (3) It must be such as could not have been discovered before the trial bv the exercise of due diligence; (4) It must be material to the issue; (5) It must not be cumulative to the former issue; and (6) it must not be merely impeaching or contradicting the former... | |
 | 1915 - 600 стор.
...new trial is granted; second, it must have been discovered since the trial ; third, it must be such as could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence; fourth, it must be material to the issue; fifth, it must not be cumulative to the former issue ; *... | |
 | 1902 - 644 стор.
...court below to hold that it would probably change the result if a new trial was granted nor that it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence. APPEAL from a judgment of the supreme court, rendered at a trial term for the county of New York April... | |
 | 1902 - 1178 стор.
...search was made for the letter, and it was then found. We think the affidavit showed that the evidence could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of proper diligence, but we do not think that it fulfills the further requirement that it would probably... | |
 | 1915 - 1138 стор.
...Me. 314. A new trial will not be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence, when It could have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence. Howard v. G rover, 28 Me. 07, 48 Am. Dec. 478; Blake v. Madigan, 65 Me. 522; Kimball v. Hilton, 92... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1887 - 706 стор.
...Before a new trial will be granted on account of newly discovered evidence, it must appear that it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence. Crozier v. Cooper, H 111. 139 ; Lafflin v. Herrington, 17 IlI. 399 ; Wright v. Gould, 73 111. 56 ;... | |
 | 1922 - 1202 стор.
...render a different result reasonably certain; that it has been discovered since the trial; that it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence; is material and not cumulative. 2. New trial ©=э102(8)— Not granted on ground... | |
 | 1908 - 1256 стор.
...only satisfy the court that the evidence has come to his knowledge since the trial, but also that it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of proper diligence. [Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 37, New Trial, § 210.] 2.... | |
| |
... it must be such as could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence... 
