 ... this insurance, as to the interest of the mortgagee (or trustee) only herein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the within described property, nor by any foreclosure or other proceedings or notice of sale...  The New York Supplement - Сторінка 2271917Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1894 - 722 стор.
...not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the within described property, nor by any foreclosure or other proceedings or notice...relating to the property, nor by any change in the title, occupation or ownership of the property, nor Mutual Life Insurance Co. ». Schwab. by the occupation... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1897 - 810 стор.
...not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the within described property, nor by any foreclosure or other proceedings or notice...relating to the property, nor by any change in the title, occupation or ownership of the property, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous... | |
 | James De Fremery - 1860 - 118 стор.
...only therein, be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the property insured, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous than are permitted by the policy. " And it is further agreed, between the parties hereto, that the mortgagee shall notify... | |
 | 1871 - 992 стор.
...therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagee or owner of the property injured, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes...hazardous than are permitted by this policy, provided that the mortgagee shall notify this Company of any change of ownership or increase of hazard, <r/ii*-/i... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1910 - 748 стор.
...not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner, of the within described property, nor by any foreclosure or other proceedings or notice...for purposes more hazardous than are permitted by Statement of the Case. this policy; provided, that in case the mortgagor or owner shall neglect to... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1879 - 750 стор.
...should not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the property insured, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous than were permitted by the policy. But it was further agreed, in substance, that if the defendant should... | |
 | 1881 - 972 стор.
...trustee or successors only, should not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the property, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous than were permitted! by the policy, only requiring him or the holder of the note to notify the company of... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1882 - 706 стор.
...therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the property insured, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous than are permitted by this policy. * * * It is also agreed, that whenever the company shall pay the holder of any such notes or bonds,... | |
 | Charles Cole Hine, Walter S. Nichols - 1882 - 820 стор.
...trustee or successors only, should not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the property, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous than were permitted by the policy, only requiring him or the holder of the note to notify the company of... | |
 | Ontario. High Court of Justice - 1882 - 706 стор.
...therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the property insured, nor by the occupation of the premises for purposes more hazardous than are permitted by the terms of this policy." A loss having occurred, the defendants disputed their liability, and the... | |
| |
