Зображення сторінки
PDF
ePub

The pronoun it ought as seldom as possible to be placed at the close of a sentence. When it immediately succeeds a verb, its effect is not so disagreeable; but when joined with a preposition, it is intolerable.

When you are pinched with any former, and yet unrepealed act of parliament, you declare that, in some cases, you will not be obliged by it.-Dryden's Epistle to the Whigs.

I would humbly offer an amendment, that instead of the word Christianity, may be put religion in general; which, I conceive, will much better answer all the good ends proposed by the projectors of it.-Swift's Argument against abolishing Christianity.

Every nature, you perceive, is either too excellent to want it, or too base to be capable of it.-Harris's Dialogue concerning Art.

Although it is not always necessary that everything advanced by the speaker, should convey information to the hearer, it is necessary that he should believe himself informed by what is said, ere he can be convinced or persuaded by it.-Campbell's Philosophy of Rhetoric.

It is surprising that writers who have paid the smallest attention to elegance, should allow the word it to conclude two successive periods. Yet instances of this kind sometimes occur.

In like manner, if a person in broad day-light were falling asleep, to introduce a sudden darkness would prevent his sleep for that time, though silence and darkness in themselves, and not suddenly introduced, are very favourable to it. This I knew only by conjecture on the analogy of the senses when I first digested these observations; but I have since experienced it.—Burke on the Sublime and Beautiful.

The general idea of good or bad fortune, therefore, creates some .concern for the person who has met with it; but the general idea of provocation excites no sympathy with the anger of the man who has received it. Nature, it seems, teaches us to be more averse to enter into this passion, and, till informed of its cause, to be disposed rather to take part against it.-Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.

VI. In the members of a sentence where two objects are either compared or contrasted, some resemblance in the language and construction should be preserved. To illustrate this rule, I shall produce various instances of deviations from it; beginning with resemblances expressed in words which have no resemblance.

I have observed of late, the style of some great ministers very

much to exceed that of any other productions.-Swift on the English Tongue.

Instead of productions, which bear no resemblance to ministers great or small, the author ought to have employed the word writers.

I cannot but fancy, however, that this imitation, which passes so currently with other judgments, must at some time or other have stuck a little with your lordship.-Shaftesbury on Enthusiasm.

This sentence ought to have stood thus : "I cannot but fancy, however, that this imitation, which passes so currently with others, must at some time or other have stuck with your lordship."

Force was resisted by force, valour opposed by valour, and art encountered or eluded by similar address.—Gillies's Hist. of Greece.

This period is evidently marred by an injudicious attempt to vary the phraseology. "Force was resisted by force, valour opposed by valour, and art encountered or eluded by art.'

[ocr errors]

It is a still greater deviation from congruity, to affect not only variety in the words, but also in the construction. There is a fault of this kind in the following sentence, in which the author is speaking of Shakspeare.

There may remain a suspicion that we over-rate the greatness of his genius, in the same manner as bodies appear more gigantic on account of their being disproportioned and mis-shapen.—Hume's Hist. of England.

The sentence might have been constructed in this manner: "There may remain a suspicion that we overrate the greatness of his genius, in the same manner as we over-rate the greatness of bodies that are disproportioned and mis-shapen."

Attention should also be paid to the length of the parallel members of a period. To produce a resemblance between such members, they ought not only to be constructed in the same manner, but also to be as nearly as possible of the same length. By neglecting

G

this circumstance, the subsequent example is rendered. liable to exception.

As the performance of all other religious duties will not avail in the sight of God, without charity; so neither will the discharge of all other ministerial duties avail in the sight of men, without a faithful discharge of this principal duty.—Bolingbroke's Dissertation on Parties.

In the following passage, all the errors are accumulated which a period expressing a resemblance can well admit.

Ministers are answerable for everything done to the prejudice of the constitution, in the same proportion as the preservation of the constitution, in its purity and vigour, or the perverting and weakening it, are of greater consequence to the nation, than any other instances of good or bad government.-Bolingbroke's Dissertation on Parties.

As resemblance ought to be studied in the words which express two resembling objects, so opposition ought to be studied in the words which express two contrasted objects. The following examples contain deviations from this rule :—

A friend exaggerates a man's virtues, an enemy inflames his crimes. Addison, Spectator.

Here the opposition in the thought is neglected in the words, which at first view seem to import that the friend and the enemy are employed in different matters, without any relation to each other, whether of resemblance or of opposition. The contrast will be better marked by expressing the idea as follows: "A friend exaggerates a man's virtues, an enemy his crimes."

The wise man is happy when he gains his own approbation; the fool when he recommends himself to the applause of those about him.-Spectator.

This sentence might have stood thus: "The wise man is happy when he gains his own approbation; the fool when he gains that of others."

The laughers will be for those who have most wit; the serious part of mankind for those who have most reason on their side.Bolingbroke's Dissertation on Parties.

The opposition would have been more completely expressed in this manner: "The laughers will be for those who have most wit; the serious, for those who have most reason on their side."

In the following passage, we find two great poets very skilfully contrasted with each other.

Homer was the greater genius, Virgil the better artist; in the one, we most admire the man, in the other the work. Homer hurries us with a commanding impetuosity; Virgil leads us with an attractive majesty. Homer scatters with a generous profusion; Virgil bestows with a careful magnificence. Homer, like the Nile, pours out his riches with a sudden overflow; Virgil, like a river in its banks, with a constant stream.-Pope's Preface to Homer.

This picture, however, would have been more finished, if to the Nile some particular river had been opposed.

HARMONY IN THE STRUCTURE OF SENTENCES.

ALTHOUGH Sound is a quality of much less importance than sense, yet it must not be altogether disregarded; for as sounds are the vehicle of our ideas, there must always be an intimate connexion between the idea which is conveyed, and the sound employed in its conveyance. Pleasing ideas can hardly be transmitted to the mind by means of harsh and disagreeable sounds. At these the mind immediately revolts. Nothing can enter into the affections which stumbles at the threshold by offending the ear. Music has naturally a great power over all men to prompt and facilitate certain emotions; insomuch that there are scarcely any dispositions which we wish to raise in others, but certain sounds may be found concordant to those dispositions, and tending to excite and promote them. Language is

to a certain degree possessed of the same power: not content with simply interpreting our ideas to the hearer, it can enforce them by corresponding sounds; and to the pleasure of imparted knowledge, can add the new and separate pleasure of melody.

In the harmony of sentences, two circumstances may be considered; agreeable sound, or modulation, in general, without any particular expression, and sound so regulated as to become expressive of the sense.

Let us first consider sound in general, as the property of a well-constructed sentence. The musical cadence of a sentence will depend upon two circumstances; the choice of words, and the arrangement of them.

With regard to the choice of words, little can be said, unless we descend into tedious details concerning the powers of the several letters, or simple sounds, of which speech is composed. It is evident that those words are. most agreeable to the ear which are composed of smooth and liquid sounds, where there is a proper intermixture of vowels and consonants, without too many harsh consonants clashing with each other, or too many open vowels in succession causing a hiatus. It may always be assumed as a principle, that whatever words are difficult in pronunciation, are, in the same proportion, harsh and painful to the ear. Vowels add softness, consonants strength to the sound of words. The melody of language requires a due proportion of both, and will be destroyed by an excess of either. Long words are commonly more agreeable to the ear than monosyllables: they please it by the succession of sounds which they present; and accordingly the most musical languages possess them in the greatest abundance. Among words of any length, those are the most musical which do not wholly consist of either long or short syllables, but contain a due intermixture of both.

The English language abounds with monosyllables, more particularly that portion of the language which is derived from the Anglo-Saxon; and the difficulty of forming an harmonious combination of so many short

« НазадПродовжити »