The Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of ... , 93-1, Mar. 15, 16, and Apr. 5, 1973
1973 - 507 стор.
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
accompanying action additional administrative agency alleged allowed alternatives amended Antitrust Division antitrust laws appeal application appropriate approval Attorney believe bill certificate civil Commission committee communications complaint concern consent decree consider consideration corporate counsel court of appeals decision defendant denied Department Department of Justice determination direct district court effect enforcement entered Expediting Act fact Federal filed final formal give going Government granted groups hearing important increase individual intervention involved issues judge judgment judicial Justice legislation license limited litigation matter ment objections officials participation parties penalties permit person possible practice present problem procedures proceedings proposed protect provisions public impact public interest PUBLIC PARTICIPATION question reason record relief represented require response result rule Senator settlement standing statement substantial suggested supra note Supreme Court tion Trade trial Tunney United violations
Сторінка 404 - ... include in every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and other major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement by the responsible official on — (i) the environmental impact of the proposed action, (ii) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, (iii) alternatives to the proposed action, (iv) the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the...
Сторінка 385 - Commission will be best adapted to a comprehensive plan for improving or developing a waterway or waterways for the use or benefit of interstate or foreign commerce, for the improvement and utilization of waterpower development, and for other beneficial public uses, including recreational purposes...
Сторінка 298 - In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
Сторінка 293 - In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.
Сторінка 276 - A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof.
Сторінка 298 - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
Сторінка 58 - The Sherman Act was designed to be a comprehensive charter of economic liberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade. It rests on the premise that the unrestrained interaction of competitive forces will yield the best allocation of our economic resources, the lowest prices, the highest quality and the greatest material progress, while at the same time providing an environment conducive to the preservation of our democratic, political and social institutions.
Сторінка 393 - ... such safety standards to protect health and to minimize danger to life or property as the Commission may by rule establish...
Сторінка 298 - ... or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (6) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court.
Сторінка 293 - INTERVENTION (a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: (1) When a statute of the United States confers an unconditional right to intervene; or (2) when the representation of the applicant's interest by existing parties is or may be inadequate and the applicant is or may be bound by a judgment in the action...