Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, Том 200
Michigan. Supreme Court, Harry Burns Hutchins, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper, Van Buren Denslow, Marshall Davis Ewell, Edgar Arthur Cooley, John L. Stoddard, Edward Gott (A.), Russell Cowles Ostrander
Phelphs & Stevens, printers, 1919
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Інші видання - Показати все
action affirmed alleged alley amount appears appellee assigned Assumpsit award bill Bird Boardman River brings error Brooke cause certiorari charge circuit court circuit judge claim claimant Comp concurred contract contributory negligence Copper Range Company corporation counsel court of equity damages deceased Decided March 27 decree deed defendant defendant's Detroit United Railway direct a verdict Docket employee employment evidence fact fendant filed fraud held industrial accident board injury judgment jurisdiction jury Kuhn land liability ment Michigan Montcalm county Moore mortgage motion negligence Ostrander owner paid party payment person plaintiff premises probate probate court proceedings provisions purpose question quitclaim deed railroad Railway reason record recover refused remainderman replevin reversible error Roiser statute Steere stockholders Stone street Submitted January subrogation taxicab telephone testified testimony thereof tiff tion trial court Trimountain wife witness workmen's compensation writ
Сторінка 278 - It need not have been foreseen or or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.
Сторінка 260 - To have and to hold the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging, or in any wise thereunto appertaining, and, all the estate, right, title, interest, and claim whatever, of the said party of the first part...
Сторінка 51 - A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife, without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband, without his consent; nor can either, during the marriage or afterwards, be, without the consent of the other, examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage...
Сторінка 176 - ... 1. If the injured employee shall have worked in the employment in which he was working at the time of the accident, whether for the same employer or not, during substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding his injury, his average annual earnings shall consist of three hundred times the average daily wage or salary which he shall have earned in such employment during the days when so employed ; 2.
Сторінка 198 - accident" as used in this Act, shall, unless a different meaning is clearly indicated by the context, be construed to mean an unexpected or unforeseen event happening suddenly and violently, with or without human fault, and producing at the time objective symptoms of an injury. The term "injury" and "personal injuries" shall mean only violence to the physical structure of the body and such disease or infection as naturally results therefrom.
Сторінка 46 - ... be, without the consent of the other, examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage; but this exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding...
Сторінка 18 - ... actually regulate it in a given manner, and in a certain form, it cannot be, that the state legislatures have a right to interfere, and as it were, by way of complement to the legislation of congress, to prescribe additional regulations, and what they may deem auxiliary provisions for the same purpose. In such a case, the legislation of congress, in what it does prescribe, manifestly indicates, that it does not intend that there shall be any further legislation to act upon the subjectmatter.
Сторінка 201 - The failure to give such notice, unless excused by the Commission either on the ground that notice for some sufficient reason could not have been given, or on the ground that the insurance carrier or employer, as the case may be, has not been prejudiced thereby, shall be a bar to any claim under this act.