 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 840 стор.
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1959 - 820 стор.
...States, 168 US 1, 48-52. There the Court said: The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1920 - 496 стор.
...Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dlst. v. Superior Court of Tulare County, Cal., 187 Pac. 1056. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 стор.
...331 ; Waite on Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence, p. 281 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136.) A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1900 - 2044 стор.
...168 US 1-48, 18 Snp. Ct. 27, it is said that: "The general principle announced In numerous eases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In a subsequent salt between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 стор.
...reference to which the adjudications in both extend, rrom this has arisen the rule of the Supreme Court that: "A right, question or fact, distinctly put In...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot tie disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1902 - 988 стор.
...page 48, L. ed. p. 376, Sup. Ct. Rep. p. 27: "The general principle announced in numerous cases is as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1899 - 986 стор.
...the grounds upon which this salutary rule rests. The general principle announced In numerous cases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put In...directly determined by a court of competent Jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1901 - 958 стор.
...ed. 355, 371), 18 Sup. Ct. Hep. 18, 27, we said, after an extended examination of the adjudged cases, that "a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1904 - 910 стор.
...subject of res judioata are reviewed by Mr. Justice Harían, and the general doctrine thus stated: "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or fheir... | |
| |
The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same... 
