 The rule of law is clear, that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from...  A Treatise on the Law of Evidence - Сторінка 176автори: Simon Greenleaf - 1892Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1881 - 784 стор.
...right and justice, than that if a man, by his words or acts, intentionally causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces...belief, so as to alter his own previous position, he is concluded from averring to the con* trary, if injury must result to him whom he has misled. The... | |
 | 1874 - 1086 стор.
...the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief or to alter his own position, the former is concluded from averring against...different state of things as existing at the same time." And Lord Wensleydale, in the passage quoted by Lord Cranworth, went on to say, " Whether that rule... | |
 | 1866 - 932 стор.
...established in Pirkftrd v. Sears (8), that if a man, by his words or acts, causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act in that belief, so as to alter his own previous condition, the former is estopped from denying the... | |
 | 1873 - 962 стор.
...this suit, on the well-known principle, for which Pickard v. Sears (1) is the leading authority, that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on the belief, so as to alter... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1838 - 1096 стор.
...divested by gift or sale ; of which no specific act was even surmised. But the rule of law is clear, that, where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes...existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to net on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1839 - 728 стор.
...divested by gift or sale, of which no specific act was even surmised. But the rule of law is clear, that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes...different state of things as existing at the same time ; and the plaintiff in this case might have parted with his interest in the property by verbal gift... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sandford Nevile - 1839 - 762 стор.
...divested by gift or sale, of which no specific act was even surmised. But the rule of law is clear, that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes...different state of things as existing at the same time ; and the plaintiff in this case might have parted with his interest in the property by verbal gift... | |
 | Ireland. Court of King's Bench - 1850 - 646 стор.
...(h) ; Cruchley v. Clarence (f) ; Stone v. Marsh (k). In Pichard v. Sears (/) Lord Denman says : — " "Where one by his " words or conduct wilfully causes...him to act on that belief so " as to alter his own position, the former is concluded from averring " against the latter a different state of things as... | |
 | Graham Willmore, Frederick Luard Wollaston, Henry Davison - 1839 - 810 стор.
...surmised. But the rule oi is clear, that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another : believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to ar: that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is conclndf. from averring against... | |
| |
