'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ElegyeCambridge University Press, 19 вер. 2002 р. - 568 стор. 'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies. |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-5 із 33
Сторінка xi
... refer- ence to arguments for and against the ascription , but to many readers the very presence of these poems in the four most widely used one - volume editions of Shakespeare , which sell thousands of copies every year , may be taken ...
... refer- ence to arguments for and against the ascription , but to many readers the very presence of these poems in the four most widely used one - volume editions of Shakespeare , which sell thousands of copies every year , may be taken ...
Сторінка xiii
... proves the opposite , that he was often plagiarized . He quoted Charles Barber to support his claim that Shakespeare was unusual in using the personal pronoun who to refer to antecedent inanimates ( ' the knees Preface xiii.
... proves the opposite , that he was often plagiarized . He quoted Charles Barber to support his claim that Shakespeare was unusual in using the personal pronoun who to refer to antecedent inanimates ( ' the knees Preface xiii.
Сторінка xiv
Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall Elegye Brian Vickers. who to refer to antecedent inanimates ( ' the knees who ' ) , but Barber had actually pointed out that what is , by modern standards , an anomaly , was common usage in ...
Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall Elegye Brian Vickers. who to refer to antecedent inanimates ( ' the knees who ' ) , but Barber had actually pointed out that what is , by modern standards , an anomaly , was common usage in ...
Сторінка 40
Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено.
Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено.
Сторінка 52
Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено.
Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено.
Зміст
1 | |
PART I Donald Fosters Shakespearean construct | 55 |
PART II John Fords Funerall Elegye | 261 |
Appendices | 467 |
Notes | 509 |
554 | |
563 | |
Інші видання - Показати все
'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ... Brian Vickers Обмежений попередній перегляд - 2002 |
'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ... Brian Vickers Попередній перегляд недоступний - 2009 |
'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ... Brian Vickers Попередній перегляд недоступний - 2002 |
Загальні терміни та фрази
Abrams abstract ascription attribution authorship studies Brian Vickers canon Christes Bloodie Sweat cited critics Cyrus Hoy death Dekker described diction discussion Donald Foster doth dramatist edition editors Elegy Elegye's Elizabethan Elliott and Valenza English essay evidence fair Fames Memoriall figure Ford's plays Ford's poems Foster claimed frequently Funeral Elegy Funerall Elegye Golden Meane hendiadys Henry instances John Ford Laws of Candy linguistic literary Love's Sacrifice Lover's Melancholy mind modern Monsarrat Mountjoy never Noble noun occurs opinion Oxford passage percent Perkin Warbeck phrase poem's poet poet's poetry praise prose published punctuation readers recurs refer Renaissance rhetoric rhyme Richard sample scenes scholars sequence Shakespeare's authorship Sonnets stanza statistics style stylistic Sun's Darling syntactical syntax Taylor tests thee Thomas thou tion usage verb verse line Vickers virtue vocabulary William Peter William Shakespeare Witch of Edmonton words writing wrote youth