You and the State: A Fairly Brief Introduction to Political PhilosophyRowman & Littlefield, 2008 - 215 стор. Jan Narveson asks the provocative, philosophical question: is the state necessary? In this unusual introduction to political philosophy, Narveson draws on the history of political philosophy and discusses its main theories_classic liberal, democratic, socialist, radical_with reference to how each sees the place of the individual in the political order. Narveson's critique is situated within issues of freedom, authority, economic welfare, international relations and others to explore how and whether the state is necessary. His argument is ultimately anti-statist and takes seriously the question of whether and how some version of anarchism might make sense. |
Зміст
What Is Political Philosophy About? Why Do It? | 1 |
Right and Might From the Jungle to Civilized Government? | 25 |
Pushing the Good Conservatism and the Guardian State | 53 |
Classic Liberalism and the Minimal State | 81 |
Democracy All Power to the People? | 115 |
The Modern Regulatory Welfare State | 135 |
War and Peace Immigration and Trade | 163 |
Taking Anarchism Seriously | 183 |
Bibliography | 203 |
209 | |
About the Author | |
Інші видання - Показати все
You and the State: A Short Introduction to Political Philosophy Jan Narveson Обмежений попередній перегляд - 2008 |
You and the State: A Fairly Brief Introduction to Political Philosophy Jan Narveson Перегляд фрагмента - 2008 |
You and the State: A Fairly Brief Introduction to Political Philosophy Jan Narveson Перегляд фрагмента - 2008 |
Загальні терміни та фрази
able accept action actually agree anarchy answer argument associations basic benefit better chapter citizens claim classic clear concerned considerable costs course deal democracy effect elected equal especially example fact fair fellow force freedom fundamental given hand happen Hobbes human idea important imposing individuals interest issue it's justice kind least less liberalism liberty lives look major matter means moral nature noted obviously parties perhaps person philosophy political possible precisely Press principle problem production proposed question rational reason religion respect rule sense simply social society someone sort supposed sure theory things thought tion true turn University usually various vote welfare wrong