| United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1804 - 514 стор.
...complained of, authorize the procefs ? It is not by the office of the perfon to whom the writ is direfted, but the nature of the thing to be done that the propriety or impropriety of iffuing a mandamus, is t7be determined. Where the head of a department acts in a... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 486 стор.
...for a remedy, id. 166 21. The propriety, or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined, not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to be done, id. . 170 22. It is the essential criterion of appellate jurisdiction... | |
| Nicholas Baylies - 1814 - 478 стор.
...for a remedy. Ibid. 166. 73 The propriety, or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined, not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to be done. Marbury v. Madison. 1 Crancli, 170. 74 It is the essential criterion... | |
| Nathan Dane - 1824 - 768 стор.
...party is entitled : 2. That the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus, is to be determined, not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to he done : 3. That a mandamus may be directed to an inferior court. Connected... | |
| John Marshall - 1839 - 762 стор.
...such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process ? Ut is not by the office of the person to whom the writ...nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined^ Where the head of a department acts in a... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1913 - 710 стор.
...title may be, a ministerial officer. Chief Justice Marshall said in Marbury v. Madison, i Cranch, 137: "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined." The question of the jurisdiction of a court... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1861 - 704 стор.
...right, and is presented according to the forms of judicial proceeding. 12 Peters, 614; 2 Peters, 450. It is not by the office of the person to whom the...directed, but the nature of the thing to be done, that the proCommonwealth of Ky. v. Denntson, Governor, &c. priety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to... | |
| Charles Sidney Whitman - 1871 - 736 стор.
...mandamus is a proper remedy. (Moses on Mandamus, 63.) It was held, in the case of Marbury v. Madison, that ''It is not by the office of the person to whom...nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined. Where the head of a department acts in a... | |
| Charles Sidney Whitman - 1871 - 734 стор.
...mandamus is a proper remedy. (Moses on Mandamus, 63.) It was held, in the case of Marbury v. Madison, that " It is not by the office of the person to whom...nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined. AVhere the head of a department acts in a... | |
| |