| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 800 стор.
...556 (36 Sup. Ct. 188, LR A. 1916C, 797), where it is stated that the question is: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" The car upon which the plaintiff was employed went from one State into the other, and the plaintiff being... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 806 стор.
...en200— Mich.— 2. gaged in intrastate commerce. It was said that the test was: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation,...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" And that question was answered in the negative, and the State board's award was affirmed. In New York... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1919 - 716 стор.
...performed. * * * The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in inter-State transportation...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" — citing Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. 239 US 556The work covered in repairing... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 694 стор.
...Employer's Liability act or the State Compensation act is whether at the time of his injury he was engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. 2. SAME — what does not bring injury within Federal Employer's Liability act. The mere expectation... | |
| 1916 - 506 стор.
...that: "The federal act speaks of interstate commerce in a practical sense suited to the occasion and 'the true test of employment in such commerce in the...related to it as to be practically a part of it?' Manifestly there was no such close or direct relation to interstate transportation in the taking of... | |
| 1917 - 510 стор.
...the question being, was the work a part of the interstate commerce in which the carrier was engaged?7 "The true test of employment in such commerce in the...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?"8 The work of some employes, however, has a broader connection with the entire operation of the... | |
| 1920 - 496 стор.
...test being whether at the time of the injury the employe was engaged in interstate transportation or work so closely related to It as to be practically a part thereof. — Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 111., 1-5 N. E. 748. 21. ContractH... | |
| 1928 - 1130 стор.
...States said : "The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it" See, also, Chicago, Burlington & QRR v. Harrington, 241 US 177, 36 S. Ct. 517, 60 L. Ed. 941. In Pedersen... | |
| 1920 - 2100 стор.
...could be opened to permit taking out freight for delivery to consignees, held to have been employed in interstate transportation, or In work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of It, and within employers' liability Act April 22. 190S, § 1 (Comp. St § 8657). 2. MASTER AND SERVANT... | |
| 1921 - 2116 стор.
...is whether the evidence discloses that the plaintiff was engaged in interstate commerce at the time, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, and thus be entitled to the benefits of the federal Employers' Liability Act (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665).... | |
| |