Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social ExperimentUniversity of Michigan Press, 1995 - Всего страниц: 191 How important are local newspapers for disseminating information during election campaigns? A large body of literature theorizes that they should have very little effect on political behavior since the electorate is largely immune to any media influence. To what lengths would the average citizen go to obtain information about candidates should a media source suddenly be suspended during an election? Most of the literature argues that the average citizen would not seek out any additional information to supplement what they passively acquire. A newspaper strike in Pittsburgh during the 1992 elections afforded Jeffery J. Mondak an unparalleled opportunity to test these assumptions--and to prove them both wrong. Nothing to Read compares the information gathering and voting behavior of residents in Pittsburgh and Cleveland during the 1992 campaign season. Comparable in demographics and political behavior, the only significant difference between the two cities was the availability of local newspapers. Using a research design that combines elements of the opinion survey and the laboratory experiment, the author exploited this situation to produce an unusually sound and thorough examination of media effects on voters. The results are startling. First and foremost, Nothing to Read reasserts the role of the newspaper in the dissemination of information acquisition. It is the only media source that can rival television in the electoral arena, and it is often more important to voters as a source for local information, including information about U.S. House races. Nothing to Read also shows that voters are more active in seeking out information than typically postulated. Indeed, many voters even differentiate between media sources for information about Senate and House contests and sources for the presidential campaign. Within limits, the electorate is clearly not a passive news audience. Nothing to Read provides a wealth of information on such related topics as the relationship between partisanship and media influence, the interplay between media exposure and interpersonal political conversations and other social interaction, and newspapers' effect on coattail voting. A unique book, Mondak's important study lays a solid foundation for all future work on the relationship between American media and politics. Jeffery J. Mondak is Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh. |
Содержание
Newspapers Media and Mass Politics | 1 |
A Methodological Overview | 23 |
Media Exposure | 43 |
Newspapers and Political Knowledge | 75 |
News Media and Political Discussion | 101 |
Electoral Choice | 125 |
Information Acquisition in US Elections | 155 |
References | 177 |
185 | |
189 | |
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment Jeffery J. Mondak Ограниченный просмотр - 1995 |
Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment Jeffery J. Mondak Просмотр фрагмента - 1995 |
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
1992 elections Allegheny County alternative media analysis broadcast media campaign-specific information candidates chapter civics knowledge Cleveland and Pittsburgh coattail voting congressional cues Cuyahoga County Democratic Dependent variable discussant influence discussant partisanship District electoral behavior electoral choice evidence external validity House elections House races House vote impact information acquisition information context issues laboratory experiment major local newspaper media access media effects media exposure media sources methodological Mondak multinomial logit national print media Ohio's partisan attachment partisans and independents percent Pittsburgh metropolitan area Pittsburgh respondents Pittsburgh voters Pittsburgh's newspaper strike political behavior political discussion political knowledge postelection survey presidential and Senate presidential campaign presidential coattails presidential election presidential vote question relationship reported Republican respondent voted Ross Perot self-reported Senate campaigns significance social South Bend statistical strong partisans t-values television tion U.S. elections U.S. House campaigns U.S. House elections unique variables vote choice weak partisans