Зображення сторінки

room were two upright drills near the door N, and along the rear wall near the small planers a polishing head at E, a polishing belt at F, and an old-time suspension drill at G. Near the group of small lathes there was a sensitive drill at H, a slotter at J, a bolt cutter at L, and a horizontal hydraulic press at M. It will thus be seen that many of the machines were apparently located at random and with little regard for any definite plan as to their uses or the progress of the work.

In the operation of the shop, castings were received at N, the heavier ones put on trucks and taken to the group of large planers, many of them brought back to the upright drills, near the door N, some taken to the 68inch lathe at C, and then back near the group of large planers to be erected. Forgings came in through the door at P, went to the planers in the main room, the lathes opposite them, or those in the left bay, then to the hydraulic press for force fits, then back to the erecting floor at the opposite end of the department.

Face plates were roughed off on the large planers, carried to 68-inch lathes at C to be turned, and, after a more or less wandering career, finally arrived at the erecting floor. Dirt and dust from the polishing head at E and the belt at F was quite injurious to the machines in the vicinity. Transportation facilities were crude and the continual moving of material and work in progress back and forth was not only expensive, but kept the main passage in the center of the room in a constant state of congestion and blockade much of the time.

The plan for re-arranging the shop is shown in Fig. 211, and was as follows: The group of large planers, those along the rear walls of the main room and the group of large lathes opposite to them were not disturbed. The other machines were moved to the locations shown. The left bay was practically cleared of machines and made an erecting floor, the lathe B being retained for convenience of small jobs during the erecting work. The group of lathes were eliminated altogether as they were no longer needed. A polishing room was built and the machines E and F placed in it, thus confining the dust and dirt nuisance in a small space. An overhead traveling crane was set up covering the entire space of this bay, giving great convenience for the erecting of machines. A small tool room was built and in it was placed a tool grinder Q and a twist drill grinder R. A door for the receipt of castings at S, and a floor scale were put in. Shop tracks were laid as shown running from the door S, across the scale and on to the group of large planers at the rear; also, through the center of the main room, from the doors P to N, with a turntable at the intersection of these tracks. Branch tracks run through the center of the erecting floor to the door X.

The planer A, formerly in the left bay, was added to the group of planers

at the back of the main floor, and beyond them the two upright drills were placed, and still further beyond the sensitive drill H. Beyond this were located the bolt cutter L and the chucking lathe D. A large radial drill was added at T, and a vertical boring mill at U. The old-time suspension drill at G was replaced by a modern "railroad” drill at V, that is, one over the shop track upon which was fitted a special truck for supporting heavy lathe beds to be drilled. An ordinary jib crane was set up at W, for the use of the planers.

By this arrangement most of the castings were received at the door S, weighed on the scale located there, and then moved on shop cars to the large

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Fig. 211. — Plan of Department as Re-arranged for Greater Efficiency.

planers. Beds were scraped and afterwards drilled at V, and sent on shop cars to the erecting floor. Work requiring the use of the radial drill or the vertical boring mill was handled near the point of receiving castings and sent on in the same way. Face plates and spindles were finished on machines near each other and forwarded over the same line. Forgings were received through the door P and sent over the shop tracks to whatever machines were to perform the next operations upon them. Thus nearly all the work, particularly all the heavy work, was kept moving in the same direction toward the erecting floor, and the finished machines shipped out of the door at X.

By this arrangement there were no blockades, the cost of transporting materials was enormously reduced, and the output of the shop very considerably increased. An annual outlay of nearly $4000 for handling material was reduced to less than one-fourth of that amount and the work of the shop ran smoothly and satisfactorily.

The discarding of the six lathes paid for the vertical boring mill and the radial drill added, so that there was only the expense of the change from the old suspension drill to the railroad drill to add to equipment expenses, other than the shop tracks and cars and the two cranes, all of which were made in the shop. These were paid for out of the savings in transporting and shipping during the first twelve months and quite a balance left on the right side of the ledger.

Such results, or those of similar nature, can nearly always be achieved in very many of the older shops by systematic planning of machine operations, re-arranging the machines to suit a proper sequence of operations necessary for efficient and economical work, and providing proper transportation facilities. The subject so treated will tend greatly to increase the efficiency of the machines.



Many methods for increasing the efficiency of men. Direct and indirect methods. Classifica

tion of methods. Special rewards. Personal instruction. Planning machine operations. Better machines, attachments, and tools. Better drawings. System of payments. Personal interest in the work. Agreeable shop conditions. The Bonus System. The Premium Plan. The Piece Work Plan. Requirements for a successful system. Causes of dissatisfaction. Shop operation sheets. Selection of Foremen.

THERE are many methods by which we may increase the efficiency of the men employed in the average manufacturing establishment. These will quite naturally fall into one of the two classes as follows, namely:

First. Methods directly affecting efficiency.
Second. Methods indirectly affecting efficiency.

Of methods which may properly be included in the first class, those tending directly to increase efficiency, we have:

(a) By giving him a special reward for performing an amount of good work over and above that which has been determined to be a fair day's work. This is commonly called "the bonus plan.”

(6) By personal instruction as to the best methods by which the operative may

handle his work. (c) By planning machine operations and describing them clearly upon Shop Operation Sheets.

(d) By providing the operative with better machines, attachments, and tools.

(e) By providing better, clearer, and more easily understood drawings than those of former years.

Of matters and methods which operate indirectly to increase the workman's efficiency the more important will be:

(a) By adopting a system of payments that is agreeable to him as to methods and time intervals.

(6) By increasing his personal interest in his work.
(c) By making shop conditions more agreeable to him.

Referring to direct methods of increasing the efficiency of the workman, it may confidently be said that experience has amply proved that the greatest incentive to a workman is a special reward for unusual effort in turning out

his work. This work is sought to be accomplished by the Bonus System, the Premium Plan, and the Piece Work Plan, etc. Each of these has its essential principle, intended more or less to interest the workman as well as to benefit the concern.

The work for daily wages, without regard to the kind of work or the amount of the output, is usually monotonous and unsatisfactory to a man ambitious to better his condition. He may endeavor, by demonstrating his ability and energy, to attract the attention of his superiors and so lead to an increase in his pay. In this he is often disappointed, and all the more when he thinks he sees another man getting more pay for less effort and ability. The result is liable to be discouragement and a lessening of the output.

The Piece Work Plan is intended to remedy some of these difficulties. Sometimes it has done so, but frequently it has only served to aggravate them, depending to a considerable extent upon how it was managed. The results sought by this plan were:

First. To reduce the actual cost of the work to the employer.

Second. To insure a fixed cost which might be used as a basis in calculating total labor costs.

Third. To lower the amount and therefore the unit cost of supervision of the work by providing an incentive to the workman to use greater interest and energy in performing it.

Fourth. To increase the output of the plant.

Generally speaking, the question of the financial interest of the workman has seemed to receive rather slight consideration. The principal thought of the employer has appeared to be, at least from the workman's point of view, that of reducing the cost per piece to a less figure than it had been by the day pay plan, and to assure himself of a fixed price.

The plan is to have all mechanical work done “by the piece,” whether it was a single operation by hand or machine, the entire work of making a single piece, or the making and assembling of a group of parts. As in day work the employer furnished everything but labor, although occasionally the workman furnished such small consumable tools as files, etc. The promise held out to the workman was that by a little extra effort he would be enabled to add considerably to his wages.

The success of the piece work plan depended almost entirely upon the accuracy with which the piece work rate was determined, and, secondly, on how well the rate fixed was adhered to, when the workman's wages were increased beyond what the employer thought was reasonable. The usual methods were crude and inefficient in comparison with those now in use. Generally the rate was based upon the ordinary output of a day's work on the day rate plan, and therefore computed by the interested workman him

« НазадПродовжити »