Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, Том 4
Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, George Henry Burnett, Reuben S. Strahan, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Bellinger, Charles Byron, Frank A. Turner
West Publishing Company, 1876
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Інші видання - Показати все
acquired action administrator alleged amount answer appellant application appropriation assigns authority become bill cause charged Circuit Court claim Code common complaint condition consideration Constitution construction contained contract convey counsel County Court covenant crime debt decree deed defendant determine dollars duty easement effect entitled equity error evidence execution existence facts filed follows fund further grant ground heirs held indictment intention interest issue John Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land language Legislature lien limited lots matter ment mortgage necessary notice object obtained Opinion Oregon owner paid particular parties pass payment person plaintiff pleadings possession premises presented proceedings proof provides purchaser question reason received record referred regard rendered respondent road rule statement statute sufficient suit taken thereof tion trial void warrant wife
Сторінка 277 - IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. For the County of AB, (or AB and CD) Contestants, vs.
Сторінка 357 - States, create a disputable presumption, according to the matter directly determined, between the same parties and their representatives and successors in interest by title subsequent to the commencement of the action or special proceeding, litigating for the same thing under the same title and in the same capacity.
Сторінка 202 - A statement of the acts constituting the offense, in ordinary and concise language, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended.
Сторінка 73 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate.— 1873-345. 1085. It may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Сторінка 88 - ... when the question is one of a common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are very numerous and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the Court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of the whole, one action SEC.
Сторінка 134 - Every act shall embrace but one subject, and matters properly connected therewith; which subject shall be expressed in the title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act, which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be expressed in the title.
Сторінка 237 - And therefore, if the deed bears on its face evidence that the grantors intended to convey, and the grantee expected to become invested with an estate of a particular description or quality, and that the bargain had proceeded upon that footing between the parties, then, although it may not contain any covenants of title in the technical sense of the term, still the legal operation and effect of the instrument will be as binding upon the grantor and those claiming under him...
Сторінка 274 - When the words are not explicit, the intention is to be collected from the context, from the occasion and necessity of the law, from the mischief felt, and the objects and the remedy in view; and the intention is to be taken or presumed according to what is consonant to reason and good discretion.