Economics and Happiness: Framing the AnalysisThe set of papers collected in this volume aims to provide an overview of happiness studies to date, with a special emphasis on its relationship with economic thought. This volume discusses the state of the art and the main strands and contributions to the "economics of happiness", as a sub-discipline related to political economy. However, the main thrust of the volume is in focuses on the relationship between happiness studies and economics. Moreover, this volume makes a specific contribution in highlighting the comparative role and influence in the subjectivist approach vis-a-vis the objectivist approach to human happiness in the current literature in the field. The ambition of this book is to present the reader with a conceptual framework for a critical understanding of happiness studies and its relationship with economics. While the economic perspective is central, the focus here is on economics and happiness rather than the economics of happiness. |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 31
Сторінка 21
But this relation is neither exclusive (since there are significant influences on our
lives other than wealth) nor uniform (since ... living conditions and the quality of
life as it is to understand the qualified and contingent nature of this relationship.
But this relation is neither exclusive (since there are significant influences on our
lives other than wealth) nor uniform (since ... living conditions and the quality of
life as it is to understand the qualified and contingent nature of this relationship.
Сторінка 304
A person is an individual who is in essential relation with others. As Pareyson
wrote: "Human being is a relation; it is not that s/he is in relation, not that s/he has
relationships, but s/he is a relation . . .with the other" (1995: 15). This implies ...
A person is an individual who is in essential relation with others. As Pareyson
wrote: "Human being is a relation; it is not that s/he is in relation, not that s/he has
relationships, but s/he is a relation . . .with the other" (1995: 15). This implies ...
Сторінка 326
The strength of the gift as reciprocity does not lie in the thing given or how much
—as is the case with gift as munus—but in the special human quality that the gift
represents for the fact of being a relation. So it is the existence of a specific ...
The strength of the gift as reciprocity does not lie in the thing given or how much
—as is the case with gift as munus—but in the special human quality that the gift
represents for the fact of being a relation. So it is the existence of a specific ...
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Зміст
Building a Better Theory of WellBeing | 29 |
Does Absolute Income Matter? | 65 |
An Explanation | 91 |
Авторські права | |
10 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis Luigino Bruni,Pier Luigi Porta Обмежений попередній перегляд - 2005 |
Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis Luigino Bruni,Pier Luigi Porta Обмежений попередній перегляд - 2005 |
Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis Luigino Bruni,Pier Luigi Porta Попередній перегляд недоступний - 2007 |
Загальні терміни та фрази
achievement affiliation altruism analysis approach Aristotle attachment theory behavior benefits Cambridge capability approach choice coefficient cohort concept consumption cycle Daniel Kahneman defined Diener distribution domain Easterlin Economic Ioumal economic theory economists Effects t-ratio emotional empirical eudaimonia evaluation evidence example experience explain feelings financial satisfaction find findings first GSOEP happier hedonic adaptation hedonic treadmill household human hypothesis income aspirations increase indifference curves individual influence Ioumal of Economic Kahneman less living marginal utility marital marriage married measures moral motive nations negative ordered probit Oswald p-value paradoxes of happiness people's percent person pleasure positive Praag preferences Psychology reciprocity reflects regression relation relationship relative deprivation reported response sample satisfied scores self-reported setpoint significant significantly Smith social interaction Society specific Stutzer subjective well-being survey Table tion University Press utility function variables Veenhoven welfare function York