| robert blatchford - 1904 - 230 стор.
...Adam. Adam was a myth. Hardly any educated Christians now regard him as an historic person. But—no Adam, no Fall; no Fall, no Atonement; no Atonement,...Stone Age, or the Bronze Age, or in the Age of Iron ? There never was any " Fall." Evolution proves a long, slow rise. And if there never was a Fall, why... | |
| Frank Ballard - 1908 - 220 стор.
...sentiment in the name of science may object. It sounds, confessedly, very simple and conclusive to write, " No Adam, no Fall ; no Fall, no Atonement ; no Atonement,...Accepting evolution, how can we believe in a Fall? There never was any Fall. Evolution proves a long slow rise." But these simplicities of negation are... | |
| Robert Blatchford - 1910 - 226 стор.
...disposed of Adam. Adam was a myth. Hardly any educated Christians now regard him as an historic person. But — no Adam, no Fall; no Fall, no Atonement; no...Stone Age, or the Bronze Age, or in the Age of Iron ? There never was any " Fall." Evolution proves a long, slow rise. And if there never was a Fall, why... | |
| Robert Blatchford - 1919 - 264 стор.
...disposed of Adam. Adam was a myth. Hardly any educated Christians now regard him as an historic person. But — no Adam, no Fall ; no Fall, no Atonement ;...Stone Age, or the Bronze Age, or in the Age of Iron? There never was any " Fall." Evolution proves a long, slow rise. And if there never was a Fall, why... | |
| Ernest J. Wrage - 1962 - 402 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| Isaac Asimov - 1984 - 654 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| Ronald L. Numbers - 1995 - 658 стор.
...better understand the logic of the situation from the following pungent statement of Robert Blatchford: "But— no Adam, no Fall; no Fall, no Atonement; no...before he ceased to be a monkey, or after? Was it when be was a tree man, or later? Was it in the Stone Age, or the Bronze Age, or in the Age of Iron? . .... | |
| Fred Wilson - 2000 - 394 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| |