ANALYTICAL INDEX TO THE CHARGES.
[TRACTARIANS] extracts, ibid. Their treatment of their opponents, 8. 172; pass over their arguments in silence, 172-174.
Results of their efforts very unfortunate, 511. Their Secession no serious loss, 120; a lesser evil than the success of their design, ibid. Why they should remain in the Church a perplexing question, 113; their supposed motive for so doing, 113, 114.
One of the most eventful epochs in the history of the English Church, 11; an arduous and momentous conflict, 12. Its origin, progress, and development, 40-132. 123-125, 126. Its professed object, 41. Ought to be treated with circumspection and forbearance, 125. No new controversy, 128. Represents a contrast of opinions which have always existed in the Church, ibid. Different and opposite views of, 129. An attempt to counteract an existing religious system, 130; reality and prevalence of the evil against which it was directed, 131. Has in no one instance received the formal sanction and approval of any member of the Episcopal Bench, 127. Duties to which it gives rise, 15-30. Hopes as to its issue, 122. 167. 659. 663. Character of the Movement, 124, 125, 126. 129. 185. 627. 633. 639, 640, 641. The revival of an oft-refuted system derived essential from Roman, 630. The last novelty of the day, 1. At variance with Scripture and our Church, 38. 153. 544. Involves the doctrine of Justification in obscurity, 357. 361. Opposed to the Reformation, 10. 213. (See Reformation.) Dan- gerous to the Church, 5. 7. 9. 11, 34. 126. 637.
Tendency of the movement towards Rome, 1. 5. 8. 10. 41. 46. 48, 51. 53. 57. 97, 98. 100. 108. 137. 637. Threatens the revival of the worst evils of Romish superstition, 628, 629. Its disposition to exaggeration, 167. Tends to generate an inadequate, superficial and superstitious religion, 628; to sub- stitute formality for true devotion, 170. 329; to revive unauthorized Forms and Ceremonies, 164; to undermine the whole fabric of the Reformation, and of the Gospel, 180; to disturb the peace of the Church, 34. 39. 138. 529. 541. 582; to cause schism, 138. 151. 156. 637; discord and distraction, 34. 39. 138. 165. 170. 529, 530. 541. 582, 631. 639.
Effects of the movement. On the young, 1. 6. 101. 163. 180. 519. 521. 529. 530. 637, 638, 639; on the unlearned, 5. 212. Neglect of the Word of God, 628; Exaltation of the Church, Tradition, the Sacraments, self-righteous- ness, ibid. 633; a lowered tone of practical religion, 628; cold and barren orthodoxy, 630; over-scrupulous observance of non-essential forms, 171. 511; revival of bygone follies, ibid. 518, 519. Its effects in India, 1. 186. 630; destruction of the spirituality of our missions, 631.
Beneficial effects attributed to the movement, 149-171. Successful vin- dication of some most important duties and principles of the Christian . Church, 152, 156; its union, discipline and authority, 149. 151. 161, 162. 165, 166; better understanding of its polity, 164; revived inquiry into its constitution, 158. 166. Defence and explanation of Catholic and Apostolic principles, 161. 157. Practical sense of our Corporate Character as Christians, 159. 162. 267. 270. 273. Revived assertion of Apostolical Succession, 153. 166. Juster views of the ministerial function, 154. Stricter attention to the Rubric, 151. 159. 163. 170. Due observance of Fasts and Festivals, 151, 152, 165. Self-denial and discipline, 155. Stimulus to systematic piety, 159. 162. 166. 596. Necessity and efficacy of the Sacraments, 159. 166. Spirit of inquiry among theological students, 161. Revived study of sound Theology, 166. 169; of doctrines of the Primitive Fathers,
[TRACTARIANISM.] 158. 166. Awful sense of the mystery of man's redemption, 161. Encreasing sense of the guilt and evils of schism, 165. Rescue of the Pillars of the Reformation from oblivion, 157.
Has the good or evil preponderated? 160, 161. 163. 169. Preventives or Remedies for the evils resulting from the Movement, 644— 663. Scriptural Teaching, 644-649. 659. Ecclesiastical discipline, 654- 656. More minute examination of Candidates for Holy Orders, 661. Re- vival of Convocation, 649–654. 657–659. Patience, Prayer, Humble Trust in God, 662, 663.
TRACTS FOR THE TIMES. Undertaken with laudable motives, 23. 157. 161; in some cases productive of important benefit, 23. Their declared object, 42. 149. Their favourable reception accounted for, 43. 54. Secession among admirers of, 65. Brought to a close by recommendation of the Bishop of Oxford, 104. 145. 147. Their language often painfully obscure, equivocal, and unguarded, 165. Their erroneous opinions completely refuted, 172.
Quoted. No. 15. 85; No. 31. 481; No. 35. 45; No. 38. 507. 540; No. 52. 45. No. 61. 85. No. 63. 48. 513. No. 67. 381. No. 68. 386, 387. No. 69. 388. No. 70. 479. No. 71. 47. 51. 215. 414. 479, 480, 481. 508, 510. 514. No. 75. 49. 483, 484. 510. 519. No. 78. 215. No. 79. 502. No. 80. 361, 429. 439. 440. 445. 460. No. 81. 48. No. 85. 79. 215. No. 86.78. 216. 513, 514. No. 87. 439. 440. 441. 442. 609. No. 89. 79. No. 90. 215. 480. 488. 513. 517. 532–571. Advertisement to vol. 2. 45. 46. Records, No. 10. 683. No. 25, 514. No. 34. 517. No. 35. 683. No. 41. 517. 540. TRACT 90. Its publication, ostensible and real objects, 81. 101. 537. 545. 566. Its most mischievous principle examined, 549–559. Wherein its error consists, 532. Condemned by the Hebdomadal Board, 102; their censure approved, ibid. 533; defended by all the principal Tract writers, 103. Important as an authentic declaration of the principles of the party, 103; opened the eyes of many, 104. Described by Mr. Dalgairns, 100. The author's principle examined, and the manner in which he applies it, 567, 568.
Its disastrous effects on the younger members of the University, 101. Its offensive language with reference to the Reformation, 104. Evades and misrepresents the teaching of the Homilies, 86-95; misquotes them, 96, 97. Its sophistry and evasion, 81. 84, 85. 537; its dishonest ca- suistry, 85; its unfairness, 86. 102; its dangerous tendency, 533; its neces- sary consequences, 545; its principles of interpretation examined, 548-559; endangers the integrity of Subscription, 538; at variance with the intentions of the compilers of our Articles, 540; and with the Royal Declaration, ib. 563; destroys the value of our Articles as a standard of our Christian faith, 533; an elaborate attempt to explain away the real meaning of the Articles, and to accommodate them to Romish doctrines, 537. Its interpretation of Articles VI., XI., XII., XIII., XIX., XXI., XXII., XXV., XXVIII., XXXI., XXXV., XXXVII., 542, 543. 546. 548–559. 569. Difficulty occasioned by explicit denunciation of the Romish doctrine, how met by the author, 82. 86-95; his sophistry exposed, 84-85. A process for ascertain- ing the truth the very contrary to that prescribed by our Church, 545. In- decent; offensive; absurd; incongruous; unjust; unsound; sophistical, 547. An uncatholic and schismatical procedure, 549. Discordant with the principles and practices of our Church, 552. The most daring attempt ever yet made by any of her Ministers to neutralize her distinctive doctrines, 550. Its uncandid and tortuous criticism; its intricate and subtle explanation, 559.
ANALYTICAL INDEX TO THE CHARGES.
[TRACT 90.] A dishonest course tending to corrupt the conscience, and destroy all con- fidence, 560. Its disingenuous subtleties, 560. The source of no unreasonable alarm, 564. One of the methods by which Rome has before sought to beguile us of our common sense, 564. Disturbs the peace of the Church, ibid. An in- terpretation by which the Articles may be made to mean anything or no- thing, 566. Contorts the Articles, but not so much as Calvinistic inter- preters have done, 565. One of the most dishonourable efforts of sophistry ever witnessed in theological discussions, 541. Has more than neutralized the high estimation of its author, 552.
TRADITION. Said to be the primary teacher of Divine Truth, 178; to form, with Scripture, the Rule of Faith, 178, 179; to include unwritten as well as writ- ten Tradition 178. 184; to be still a mode of imparting Divine Truth in the Church, 193; this idea favoured by our Church, 195. Spoken of as equally from God with the Bible, 195; as the interpreter of Scripture, 196.
Its true use and value, 182. Is just and proper evidence, ibid. Has no share in the standard of revealed Truth, 183. Is not of co-ordinate autho- rity with Scripture, ibid. 214. 222. The quagmire of Tradition and the Eter- nal Rock of Scripture no joint foundation, 187. Testimonies of Bilson, Bishop White, Dr. Jackson, Archbishop Bramhall, Bishops Sanderson, Tay- lor, and Patrick, Archbishops Sharpe and Potter, Doctors Brett, Leslie, Waterland, Bishop Vanmildert, and Mr. Bingham, adduced by the Bishop of Calcutta, 188-192. In what sense Irenæus speaks of an unwritten Tra- dition, 198-200. On what the controversy between the Churches of Eng- land and Rome turns, 199–200. Jewish and Roman Churches impaired by deference to Tradition, 205. Not the interpreter of Scripture, but vice versâ, 209-211. Dependant on Scripture as the parasite on the tree which sup- ports it, but which it gradually overspreads and smothers, 211. Its reception as part of Revelation involves the necessity of investing some human autho- rity with infallibility, 213. The over valuing it the ground of all Romish errors, 214. 217. Its reduction to a secondary station the first step to our religious Reformation, 217. Not the implement for digging in the mine of God's Word, 225. Its use in establishing facts, 225; in the interpreta- tion of Scripture, 229. Its value as testimony, not as authority properly so called, 236. Its undue prominence in the Tractarian system, 238. Deplorable proof of its uncertainty and insufficiency, ibid. Tractarian statement respect- ing its authority fallacious and untrue, 241. Their claims on behalf of Tradition should be established by miraculous evidence, 254. Difference between them and their opponents not one of principle but fact; of sound more than of substance, 244–248. Are their professions on the subject to be trusted? 247-248.
TRANSUBSTANTIATION. See Eucharist. Not to be made a prominent part in contro- versy with Rome, 52. 64. 414. 508. The abundant source of enormous prac- tical evils, 414. Its primary object the extravagant exaltation of the Romish Priesthood, ibid.
TRENT, COUNCIL OF. See Thirty-nine Articles, and Tract 90. Attempt to prove its decrees not irreconcilable with our Thirty-nine Articles, examined and ex- posed. 81-95.
ULTRA-PROTESTANTISM. Said to be more like Popery than the doctrines of our Church,
UNITY. Christian Unity enforced, 15-30. 334. 336-338. 340. Its inconceivable value, 269. 274. Results annexed to it, 269. On what basis to be desired, 500. Correct definition of Church Unity, 288. What is the Unity which
the Scriptures demand? 335. Disregard of Church Unity occasioned by the usurpation and false teaching of the Church of Rome, 338-340. The very subject made a cause of multiplied divisions, 499.
VAN-ESPEN. His interpretation of the Canon Law in the matter of ceremonies, 527. VAN-MILDERT, BISHOP. His Life of Waterland, 236. His Lectures, 480. Opposed to the Tractarians on the Rule of Faith, 192.
VICTORIA 1, cap. xlv. Referred to, 30.
VINCENTIUS LIRINENSIS. His rule admitted in its fullest sense for proper ends, 182. When safely adopted, 222.
VIRGIN MARY. Devotion to, exaltation and intercessory power of, 110.
VITRINGA. The Church and the Synagogue, 258.
WAKE, ARCHBISHOP. Discourse on the Eucharist, 410.
WALL, REV. History of Infant Baptism, 289.
WARD, REV. G. W. His Few More Words in Support of Tract 90, 514. 517.
WATERLAND, DR. Use and Value of Antiquity, 228. 230. 236, 237. Case of Arian Subscription, 232, 233. Reply to Kelsall, 284, 285. Quoted on the Rule of Faith, 191.
WATER. Not to be mixed with wine in the Eucharist, 519. 526. WHATELY, ARCHBISHOP. His Kingdom of Christ quoted, 422.
WHITGIFT, ARCHBISHOP. Sermon before Queen Elizabeth, 290.
WINCHESTER, BIshop of, (Sumner). His Ministerial Character of Christ referred to, 431. WISEMAN, DR. Letter to Mr. Newman, 100. Letter to the Earl of Shrewsbury, 479. 490. 514. Lectures, 203.
WORDSWORTH, REV. CHARLES. His Sermon on Evangelical Repentance, 388. 393, &c. His views of Ministerial Absolution, ibid. His treatment of the parables in Luke xv. 389. His extraordinary perversion of the 16th Article, 393. His flagrant perversion of Scripture in the case of the Corinthians and Simon Magus, 398, 399. His comment on Rev. ii. 21, 22. and Rev. iii., 20, 400. The translation of the word πivehow, 401–404.
WOODGATE, REV. A. His Brief Analysis of the Tracts on Reserve, 471.
WORKS. See Justification. Not in the remotest degree meritoriously instrumental to Justification, 362. 365, 559. Cannot justify wholly or in part, 366. Are still objects of reward, 366.
SYNTHETICAL INDEX TO THE CHARGES.
By reference to the following Index the paragraphs of every Charge may be read consecutively as they stand in the documents from which they are taken. The paragraphs omitted have no relation to the Tractarian controversy.
« НазадПродовжити » |