 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 стор.
...marks the distinction between a vested and contingent interest." Kent's Commentaries, vol. 4, p. 206. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant, before the estate limited... | |
 | Sir Edward Coke, Sir Thomas Littleton, John Henry Thomas - 1818 - 752 стор.
...liable ; as the remainder-man may die, or die without issue, before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate limited... | |
 | Richard Preston - 1820 - 554 стор.
...particular estate, whatever may be the nature of the event on which that estate is to determine. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were fallen, which invariably distinguishes a vested remainder from a remainder which is contingent (n)... | |
 | Sir Edward Coke - 1826 - 734 стор.
...of the tenant in tail ; the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possessions were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become laçant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested "•maiuder... | |
 | William Floyer Cornish - 1827 - 284 стор.
...effect in, not the criterion of a vested remainder, 98. examination of Mr. Fearne's position, that the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent, 101. POSSIBILITY,... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1891 - 700 стор.
...future enjoyment. The law favors the vesting of remainders, and does it at the first opportunity. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, that distinguishes a vested from a contingent remainder. It is the uncertainty of... | |
 | James Kent - 1830 - 556 стор.
...possession. Every remainderman may die, and without issue, before the death of the tenant for life. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become ^?acarrf7tT)at"(Trstmguishes a vested JftbJif1a^o1Tnn^eTirrcn7aTn^cp^'^\VIie n ^^_^___^_^_^^___J^j»... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - 1831 - 592 стор.
...liable, as the remainder-man may die, or die without issue, before the death of the tenant fur life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become Vacant before the estate limited... | |
 | William Cruise - 1835 - 436 стор.
...the preceding Section. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession...estate limited in remainder determines universally (d) distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. (c) [Now altered as regards such... | |
 | Sir Edward Coke, John Henry Thomas - 1836 - 796 стор.
...liable; as the remainder-man may die, or die without issue before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate limited... | |
| |
The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder... 
