 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1876 - 650 стор.
...The errors assigned as the foundation for a motion for a new trial are substantially as follows : 1. That the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence. 2. That the court erroneously gave the instructions asked to be given by the state, and refused... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1846 - 628 стор.
...which now remains for our decision, is whether the court below should have granted a new trial upon the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence. In order to authorize a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence,... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1885 - 952 стор.
...superior court of Mitchell county for burglary, and found guilty ; he made his motion for new trial, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence, and upon the further ground of newly discovered evidence in this, that search had been made... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1852 - 496 стор.
...plaintiff sued out a certiorari to the County Court, and that court reversed the judgment of the justice on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of evidence. The defendant brought a writ of error to the Supreme Court, where the decision... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1858 - 740 стор.
...it is stated, we are constrained to dissent from the conclusion, to which the learned counsel comes, that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the facts of the case. There was, to say the least of it, ample testimony to justify the ftnding. Indeed,... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - 1859 - 560 стор.
...thereupon entered by the court. At the same term a motion was made by the plaintiff for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence. The court below overruled the motion, and the plaintiff by his counsel excepted. No bill... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1864 - 604 стор.
...must stand or fall with the decision of the court on that branch of the subject. The fourth error is, that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law, and not warranted by the evidence in the case. This brings up the question of due diligence on the part... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1868 - 624 стор.
...with a copy of Bishop's Criminal Law, after they load retired to deliberate upon their verdict. 3. That the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence. The first and second causes were sworn to by the appellant, and the second was supported... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1871 - 834 стор.
...court there was a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff moved the court for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence, which motion the court overruled and entered judgment upon the verdict for the defenJan'y... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1871 - 818 стор.
...aside and order a new trial. Sims & Co. vs. Humber 208 12. When a motion was made for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence : Held, That there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the verdict, if the jury... | |
| |
There were verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $300. Thereafter the defendant made a motion for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence, that the damages assessed... 
