"Take an example, to our purpose quite : And gazing higher, purposed in his heart No cost was spared. What books he wished, he read; With years; and drank from old and fabulous wells; Of ocean mused, and on the desert waste. Aught that could rouse, expand, refine the soul. He touched his harp, and nations heard, entranced. Rapid, exhaustless, deep, his numbers flowed, In other men, his, fresh as morning, rose, And soared untrodden heights, and seemed at home, At will with all her glorious majesty. Rocks, mountains, meteors, seas, and winds, and storms, And seemed to mock the ruin he had wrought. Of Fame's dread mountain sat; not soiled and worn, As if he from the earth had laboured up; But as some bird of heavenly plumage fair, He looked, which down from higher regions came, And perched it there to see what lay beneath. "The nations gazed, and wondered much, and praised. Critics before him fell in humble plight, Confounded fell, and made debasing signs To catch his eye; and stretched and swelled themselves To bursting nigh, to utter bulky words Of admiration vast; and many, too, Many that aimed to imitate his flight, With weaker wing, unearthly fluttering made, "Great man! the nations gazed and wondered much, And praised; and many called his evil good. Wits wrote in favour of his wickedness; He died. He died of what? of wretchedness! Of fame, drank early, deeply drank, drank draughts That common millions might have quenched; then died And all his sympathies in being died. And moulder in the winds and rains of heaven; And cast ashore from Pleasure's boisterous surge, A gloomy wilderness of dying thought,— Was human happiness or grandeur found.”* Here we have an amplified delineation of great intellectual power, without a particle of moral worth. Behold the picture! How revolting! How fearful! How fiend-like! Is there a youth in the empire who would have such a capacity at the price of such a character? Ought not this dire display of mental wretched *Course of Time, book iv. ness to nullify the rage of mere intellectual ambition? Whither shall we turn to find relief from the pain and horror of this dreadful delineation! Let us fix our minds on the late Missionary Williams. Compared with him, how poor a thing was the noble bard of England! How hateful in himself and how hated by mankind! He knew, he felt, that no man loved him! In the following lines he has correctly drawn his own dark portrait, and faithfully described his own dismal condition. He thus apostrophises and reviles his species : "O man! thou feeble tenant of an hour, Who knows thee well, must quit thee with disgust, By nature vile, ennobled but by name, Each kindred brute might bid thee blush for shame! Pass on-it honours none ye wish to mourn : To mark a friend's remains these stones arise- Such were the lines written by the poet peer on the monument of his dog-the only "friend" he ever knew! How marked and melancholy a contrast to the condition of the martyred Williams, who counted friends wherever he counted men ! How was this? Whence the marvellous difference? Both were great. Yes; but their greatness was not the same. The missionary was as much distinguished by moral, as the profligate bard by intellectual, greatness. Williams was great in goodness; Byron, in evil. The one was the friend, the other the enemy, of his race. No man is good, but as he does good-his actions are the test of his principles. He that does good, labours in the sun, and his deeds are visible. Mankind soon know their benefactors. Desert does not long go unrewarded. is in the mouth of millions. brity is widening every hour. The praise of Williams The circle of his cele I question whether already he has not as many readers as Byron, and these readers of a character-oh! how different! The moral results, too, of the respective processes of perusal, how unlike to each other! As the sons of When The cause of missions is a growing one; and its progress will be limited only by the surface of our globe. The name of Williams will assuredly spread through all lands, and live through all time. righteous and the virtuous increase among the men, his glory will rise, his fame will extend! "the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall have been given to the people of the saints of the Most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him," John Williams will be venerated as one of the most illustrious Fathers of the New Era, as one of the royal line of Stephen and Antipas, and other martyrs of our God, who have lived and suffered since apostolic times; and his missionary writings, not for their literary but for their moral qualities, will rank as one of the choicest portions of the Classics of a renovated world! Will the fondest admirer of the splendours of unsanctified genius dare to predict thus much for the impious, polluted, and corrupting pages of the author of Childe Harold? I have shown, in delineating the character of Mr. Williams, and I repeat it, in order to impression—that intellectual and moral greatness have no necessary connexion, they may either exist apart or in harmonious conjunction. Moral greatness is chiefly an affair of the heart; intellectual greatness, of the understanding. Intellectual greatness mainly depends upon the original cast and magnitude of the mind: culture may do much to develope it, but native strength can result only from the stamina imparted at creation. The plough, notwithstanding its importance in working a fine soil, supplies no remedy for the defects of original sterility. Y |