Alleged Non-Past Uses of Qatal in Classical HebrewBRILL, 17 лип. 2018 р. - 175 стор. This new monograph on the Hebrew verb examines those instances in which the qatal form (the so-called "perfect" or suffix conjugation) appears to refer to present or future events. The "gnomic", "prophetic", and "performative" perfects are each treated in turn. This study is especially intended for Hebrew linguists and scholars of the Old Testament, but its results will be of interest to scholars of other Semitic languages as well. |
Зміст
Introduction | 1 |
The Gnomic Perfect | 15 |
The Prophetic Perfect | 53 |
The Performative Perfect | 115 |
Conclusion | 131 |
| 135 | |
Index of Passages | 153 |
| 160 | |
| 164 | |
Published in the series STUDIA SEMITICA NEERLANDICA | 165 |
Інші видання - Показати все
Alleged Non-past Uses of Qatal in Classical Hebrew Max Frederick Rogland Попередній перегляд недоступний - 2003 |
Загальні терміни та фрази
Alten Testament aorist Aramaic argues aspect Ben Sira Biblical Hebrew Classical Hebrew Commentary Comrie conjunctive weqatal Deir Alla deixis Dempsey discussion E. J. Brill Ereal Exegetical explained express function future tenses G. R. Driver Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley gnomic perfect Grammar Groß Hebrew verbal system hence Hendel Hoftijzer imperfective indicates indicative functions interpretation Israel iterative past Joosten Joüon and Muraoka Keil Leiden Linguistic modal Müller non-past occur participle Partridge 1982 past tense perfective aspect performative perfects performative utterances Peshitta Peursen possible present tense preterital prophetic perfect proverbs qatal Qumran quoted speech refer to Evision relative past relative tense rhetorical Rogland scholars semantic Syntax temporal tense forms texts Tropper Ugaritic understood verb form verbal forms vision Vulgate Waltke and O'Connor wayyiqtol YHWH Zech אֵין אִישׁ אָמַר אֶרֶץ אֲשֶׁר דִי הָאָרֶץ הִנֵּה וְאֵין וגו וְהִנֵּה וַיֹּאמֶר וְלֹא ז ז זז יְהוּדָה יְהוָה יְהוָה צְבָאוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל כִּי לֹא לָךְ עוֹד