 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 стор.
...justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, )<V.s7, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...interfere with private business, or impose unusual or unnecessary restrictions upon lawful occupations. In other words, its determination as to what is... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 802 стор.
...To justify the State in interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must be made to appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and are not unduly oppressive... | |
 | 1901 - 510 стор.
...necessary for the protection of such interests, subject, of course, to the restrictions that it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...particular class, require such interference ; and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1911 - 662 стор.
...State, 77 Ohio St., 214, "To justify the state in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public it must appear, first, that the interests of the public...oppressive upon individuals. The legislature may not, under guise of protecting, arbitrarily interfere with private business or impose unusual and unnecessary... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 стор.
...Stcele, 152 US, 133: "To justify the state in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first that the interests of the public...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals." The court in applying the test held that the value of the property was a very proper matter Opinion, per... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1905 - 660 стор.
...the power, he says : "To justify the state in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first that the interests of the public...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals;" and having shown that the preservation of game and fish is within the police power he proceeds to consider... | |
 | 1920 - 516 стор.
...Business. — To Justify the state in Interfering with the conduct of a lawful business, it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference, and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 636 стор.
...Justice Brown said : "To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public...such interference; and, second, that the means are reasonable for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The .Legislature... | |
 | R. H. Andrews - 1899 - 422 стор.
...deny the constitutionality of the laws. The last clause of Dr Lockhart's quotation is the key-note: "The Legislature may not, under the guise of protecting...interfere with private business, or impose unusual or unnecessary restrictions upon lauifui occupations." What is a lawful occupation ? Lawful means legal... | |
 | 1904 - 1126 стор.
...Under the guise of protecting the public interests, neither the Legislature nor the municipality can arbitrarily interfere with private business, or impose unusual and unnecessary restrictions upon lawful business and occupations. The police power cannot be used as a shield for all the ills that legislation... | |
| |
To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference; and, second, that the means... 
