Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy
University of Chicago Press, 1994 - 277 стор.
Most models of political decision-making maintain that individual preferences remain relatively constant. Why, then, are there often sudden abrupt changes in public opinion on political issues? Or total reversals by politicians on specific issues? Bryan D. Jones answers these questions by innovatively connecting insights from cognitive science and rational choice theory to political life.
Individuals and political systems alike, Jones argues, tend to be attentive to only one issue at a time. Using numerous examples from elections, public opinion polls, congressional deliberations, and of bureaucratic decision-making, he shows how shifting attentiveness can and does alter choices and political outcomes—even when underlying preferences remain relatively fixed. An individual, for example, may initially decide to vote for a candidate because of her stand on spending but change his vote when he learns of her position on abortion, never really balancing the two options.
Спробуйте виконати пошук в усіх томах: understanding
Результати 1-0 із 0
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Attention and Agendas in Politics
Rationality in Political Choice
Attention and Temporal Choice in Politics
A Change of Mind or a Change of Focus?
Raising and Focusing Attention in the Mass Public
Macropolitics Is Political Conflict Recurrent?
Policy Subsystems and the Processing of Issues
Інші видання - Показати все
action activity actually adaptive affect agenda allow alternatives analysis approach aspects assumption attention attributes become behavior candidates cause chapter choice citizens collective committees complex concerns Congress considerable context critical decision decision-making defense democratic dependent developed dimension dimensions of conflict direct domains economic electoral emergence environment equilibrium evaluation example exist factor figure fixed focus forces frames function fundamental goals groups Hence Herbert Simon human imply important individual institutions interest involves issues lead legislative less limited major mass public maximization means move nature noted occur organization outcomes parallel participants particular parties pattern period policy subsystems policymaking political position possible preferences presented problem rational reason relevant response result role seems selected Senate serial shift single situation social space spending stable structure studies subsystems suggests tend theory tion underlying understanding utility voters voting
American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy
Mark A. Smith
Обмежений попередній перегляд - 2000
Усі результати пошуку книг »
Transnational Environmental Policy: Reconstructing Ozone
Попередній перегляд недоступний - 2001