Intelligence Activities : Senate Resolution 21: Hearings Before the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session, Том 5
United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976
Відгуки відвідувачів - Написати рецензію
Не знайдено жодних рецензій.
Інші видання - Показати все
activities agent ALLEN American citizens appropriate approval asked Attorney General LEVI authority believe Bureau CHAIRMAN committee communications companies concern conducted CONGRESS THE LIBRARY constitutional course Court crime criminal deal decision Defense Department determine developed directed Director disclosure discuss domestic effect effort electronic electronic surveillance established evidence executive fact follows foreign intelligence fourth amendment going Government hearings important individual interception interest intrusion involved Justice kind LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limit matter means ment messages names national security National Security Agency necessary obtain officer operations organizations particular persons possible practice present President probable cause problem procedures protect question reasonableness regard relating request requirements responsibility rules Secret selection Senator session specific standard statement surveillance telephone things tion United warrant watch list
Сторінка 75 - Government, the right to be let alone — the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
Сторінка 72 - Nor shall anything contained in this chapter be deemed to limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the United States against the overthrow of the Government by force or other unlawful means, or against any other clear and present danger to the structure or existence of the Government.
Сторінка 87 - ... to secure information by listening devices directed to the conversation or other communications of persons suspected of subversive activities against the Government of the United States, including suspected spies.
Сторінка 104 - Over and again this Court has emphasized that the mandate of the [Fourth] Amendment requires adherence to judicial processes," United States v. Jeffers, 342 US 48, 51, and that searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.
Сторінка 20 - Nothing contained in this chapter or in section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1143; 47 USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against actual or potential attack or other hostile acts of a foreign power, to obtain foreign intelligence information deemed essential to the security of the United States, or to protect national security information against foreign intelligence activities.
Сторінка 104 - ... the support of the usual inferences which reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime. Any assumption that evidence sufficient to support a magistrate's disinterested determination to issue a search warrant will justify the officers in making a search without a warrant would reduce the Amendment...
Сторінка 81 - Amendment accepts, is that unreviewed executive discretion may yield too readily to pressures to obtain incriminating evidence and overlook potential invasions of privacy and protected speech.
Сторінка 75 - A sane, decent, civilized society must provide some such oasis, some shelter from public scrutiny, some insulated enclosure, some enclave, some inviolate place which is a man's castle.40 40 United States v.
Сторінка 94 - It appears to me the worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of English liberty and the fundamental principles of law, that ever was found in an English law book.
Сторінка 74 - Every man of an immense crowded audience appeared to me to go away as I did, ready to take arms against writs of assistance. Then and there was the first scene of the first act of opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain. Then and there the child Independence was born.