 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 стор.
...subsequent cases, is this : to consider whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1892 - 734 стор.
...order to be valid, must be only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the party in ftvor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. This is the principle which controlled the decision in Mandeville v. Harman,... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1893 - 690 стор.
...is only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public." Brewer v. Marshall, 4 CE Or. 587. See, also, reference to other cases to same... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 850 стор.
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 стор.
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either;... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 стор.
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either:... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 988 стор.
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford & fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. No certain precise boundary can be laid down, within which the restraint would be reasonable, and bevond... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 стор.
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - 744 стор.
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either... | |
| |
We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether the agreement is reasonable or not than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given,... 
