 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1915 - 734 стор.
...read in connection with all the other sections in that article, that it means to place the burden upon the holder to prove that he, or some person under whom he claims, comes within the provision of the fourth clause of the statutory definition of a holder in due course,... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 стор.
...the title of the person negotiating it." By section 1611 that: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course," etc. Under such a statute it is very clear that, when it ,' was shown that... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1909 - 588 стор.
..."a holder in due course" is defined. Section 1611 provides that "Every holder is deemed prime facie to be a holder in due course; but, when it is shown...some person under whom, he claims acquired the title in due course." By section 1607 it is provided that "The title of a person who negotiates an instrument... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 стор.
...BILLS AND NOTES. Under Comp. Laws 1907, section 1611, providing that every holder Is deemed prime facie to be a holder In due course, but, when it is shown that the title of any person who negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he -or some one... | |
 | 1908 - 1282 стор.
...in section 59 (Code Supp. 1907, § ЗОбОаЗО), as follows: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when It is shown...the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some pei-son under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1905 - 980 стор.
...only without consideration, but by a fraud on the makers of the note. Under s. 59 (Crawf., s. 98), when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated an instrument is defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 стор.
...full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon." "Sec. 76. Every holder is deemed prlma facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who was negotiated the instrument was defective the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some other... | |
 | 1914 - 448 стор.
...Negotiable Instruments Act of May 16, 1901, PL 194, provides that " every holder is deemed, prima facie, to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown...claims acquired the title as holder in due course." Section 55 declares that " the title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective, within... | |
 | 1911 - 1168 стор.
...title of the person negotiating It." Section 3450 reads as follows: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it Is shown...claims acquired the title as holder in due course. * * * " Our inquiry, therefore, is whether the bank from which respondents acquired title was a holder... | |
 | 1911 - 1164 стор.
...the title of the person negotiating it." By section 1611 that: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course," etc. Under such a statute It is very clear that, when it was shown that the... | |
| |
Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired... 
